From: Paul Aurich <paul@darkrain42.org>
To: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>
Cc: paul@darkrain42.org, Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>,
Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>,
Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>,
Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>, Bharath SM <bharathsm@microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] SMB cached directory fixes around reconnection/unmounting
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 14:29:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241108222906.3257172-1-paul@darkrain42.org> (raw)
The SMB client cached directory functionality has a few problems around
flaky/lost server connections, which manifest as a pair of BUGs when
eventually unmounting the server connection:
[18645.013550] BUG: Dentry ffff888140590ba0{i=1000000000080,n=/} still in use (2) [unmount of cifs cifs]
[18645.789274] VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of cifs (cifs)
Based on bisection, these issues started with the lease directory cache
handling introduced in commit ebe98f1447bb ("cifs: enable caching of
directories for which a lease is held"), and go away if I mount with
'nohandlecache'. I started seeing these on Debian Bookworm stable kernel
(v6.1.x), but the issues persist even in current git versions. I think the
situation was improved (occurrence frequency went down) with
commit 5c86919455c1 ("smb: client: fix use-after-free in
smb2_query_info_compound()").
I'm able to reproduce the "Dentry still in use" errors by connecting to an
actively-used SMB share (the server organically generates lease breaks) and
leaving these running for 'a while':
- while true; do cd ~; sleep 1; for i in {1..3}; do cd /mnt/test/subdir; echo $PWD; sleep 1; cd ..; echo $PWD; sleep 1; done; echo ...; done
- while true; do iptables -F OUTPUT; mount -t cifs -a; for _ in {0..2}; do ls /mnt/test/subdir/ | wc -l; done; iptables -I OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 445 -j DROP; sleep 10; echo "unmounting"; umount -l -t cifs -a; echo "done unmounting"; sleep 20; echo "recovering"; iptables -F OUTPUT; sleep 10; done
('a while' is anywhere from 10 minutes to overnight. Also, it's not the
cleanest reproducer, but I stopped iterating once I had something that was
even remotely reliable for me...)
This series attempts to fix these, as well as a use-after-free that could
occur because open_cached_dir() explicitly frees the cached_fid, rather than
relying on reference counting.
The last patch in this series (smb: During umount, flush any pending lease
breaks for cached dirs) is a work-in-progress, and should not be taken as-is.
The issue there:
Unmounting an SMB share (cifs_kill_sb) can race with a queued lease break from
the server for a cached directory. When this happens, the cfid is removed
from the linked list, so close_all_cached_dirs() cannot drop the dentry. If
cifs_kill_sb continues on before the queued work puts the dentry, we trigger
the "Dentry still in use" BUG splat. Flushing the cifsiod_wq seems to help
this, but some thoughts:
1. cifsiod_wq is a global workqueue, rather than per-mount. Flushing the
entire workqueue is potentially doing more work that necessary. Should
there be a workqueue that's more appropriately scoped?
2. With an unresponsive server, this causes umount (even umount -l) to hang
(waiting for SMB2_close calls), and when I test with backports on a 6.1
kernel, appears to cause a deadlock between kill_sb and some cifs
reconnection code calling iterate_supers_type. (Pretty sure the deadlock
was addressed by changes to fs/super.c, so not really an SMB problem, but
just an indication that flush_waitqueue isn't the right solution).
3. Should cached_dir_lease_break() drop the dentry before queueing work
(and if so, is it OK to do this under the spinlock, or should the spinlock
be dropped first)?
4. Related to #3 -- shouldn't close_all_cached_dirs() be holding the spinlock
while looping?
Lastly, patches 2, 3, and 5 (in its final form) are beneficial going back to
v6.1 for stable, but it's not a clean backport because some other important
fixes (commit 5c86919455c1 ("smb: client: fix use-after-free in
smb2_query_info_compound()") weren't picked up.
Paul Aurich (5):
smb: cached directories can be more than root file handle
smb: Don't leak cfid when reconnect races with open_cached_dir
smb: prevent use-after-free due to open_cached_dir error paths
smb: No need to wait for work when cleaning up cached directories
smb: During umount, flush any pending lease breaks for cached dirs
fs/smb/client/cached_dir.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
--
2.45.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-11-08 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-08 22:29 Paul Aurich [this message]
2024-11-08 22:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] smb: cached directories can be more than root file handle Paul Aurich
2024-11-08 22:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] smb: Don't leak cfid when reconnect races with open_cached_dir Paul Aurich
2024-11-08 22:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] smb: prevent use-after-free due to open_cached_dir error paths Paul Aurich
2024-11-08 22:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] smb: No need to wait for work when cleaning up cached directories Paul Aurich
2024-11-08 22:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] smb: During umount, flush any pending lease breaks for cached dirs Paul Aurich
2024-11-08 22:33 ` Steve French
2024-11-08 22:39 ` [PATCH 0/5] SMB cached directory fixes around reconnection/unmounting Steve French
2024-11-08 22:44 ` Paul Aurich
2024-11-08 23:09 ` Enzo Matsumiya
2024-11-10 0:49 ` Steve French
2024-11-13 19:08 ` Paul Aurich
2024-11-18 17:40 ` Steve French
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241108222906.3257172-1-paul@darkrain42.org \
--to=paul@darkrain42.org \
--cc=bharathsm@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pc@manguebit.com \
--cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
--cc=sprasad@microsoft.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox