From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 677B286330; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 22:23:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740349400; cv=none; b=TPXBxtdGmMLBTkJyzmpJr/pVLISXiegzhlrmx64SOVKAhwSA6ShHfYK548coxX3fuAvMwiBUfZka7imDO658ixE4QANjJwAHwR176KkexKcz5xe/vNivWpcSXRcrq3wG7law1pA9qT6PGMZtda5zl+xJpzi53gm6NqnxjEcqCtk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740349400; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cO+03W7LKSpfkqlQl1tWjap1YNAiUiYyUXY+/lqyh54=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dn1oK3yJMd09tDjP+YfRvh3UZ+Z1+6islAUGC6BV10rDJtdVQeRx0bFtssencT/qIpbBBhjkaztqhEX74ro6vlXMDWcSqPCOv1n5bnwSyKqVli8T3X070qSpJ9QkFp7a3OlaYcCUH9jmxD1z42HavPznRoYukFFZamchWZKYKsU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=AzO88M6M; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="AzO88M6M" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86C50C4CEDD; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 22:23:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1740349399; bh=cO+03W7LKSpfkqlQl1tWjap1YNAiUiYyUXY+/lqyh54=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=AzO88M6M022VYoqB6BqZvXJjMDiRGeeOrLcuJ1xpc/b1ZWQQP0xSI/yDtRKRa/Fgt 91oOVlucUr0q1w24Yj03wY9ilI3cHi1W21qNSBD+1GEI2nfrDwfgHy4irMRV1Y1LWU If8mXGYyKZagiDh9a/hFSwHepz5fsW0istb/haIuuv9IclSLUWHTW5Hm5JUXH7e87O Q/+jm1ga9oQoka4w/8AQPuYgKTIk/BoPQo1AhZVIfNYrlzBROplu+NKv0l8+seiDrT 4isNZoVySHlWVa8U0aUoMu9dk0iXqxedty0L7tkiohWxvSLdAD2AV3r9+WhrjikWw0 Am5IRZoTaepsA== Received: by pali.im (Postfix) id 75C53A00; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 23:23:06 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 23:23:06 +0100 From: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= To: Steve French , Paulo Alcantara , Ronnie Sahlberg Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] cifs: Handle all name surrogate reparse points Message-ID: <20250223222306.plgy3bpy5mjojfve@pali> References: <20241222145845.23801-1-pali@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20241222145845.23801-1-pali@kernel.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Hello Steve, I see that you have merged first two changes (1/4 and 2/4) from this patch series, but the remaining (3/4 and 4/4). Is there any reason why 3/4 and 4/4 was not taken? On Sunday 22 December 2024 15:58:41 Pali Rohár wrote: > Name surrogate reparse point represents another named entity in the system. > > If the name surrogate reparse point is not handled by Linux SMB client > and it is of directory type then treat it as a new mount point. > > Cleanup code for all explicit surrogate reparse points (like reparse > points with tag IO_REPARSE_TAG_MOUNT_POINT) as they are handled by > generic name surrogate reparse point code. > > Pali Rohár (4): > cifs: Throw -EOPNOTSUPP error on unsupported reparse point type from > parse_reparse_point() > cifs: Treat unhandled directory name surrogate reparse points as mount > directory nodes > cifs: Remove explicit handling of IO_REPARSE_TAG_MOUNT_POINT in > inode.c > cifs: Improve handling of name surrogate reparse points in reparse.c > > fs/smb/client/inode.c | 17 +++++++++++++---- > fs/smb/client/reparse.c | 24 ++++++++++-------------- > fs/smb/common/smbfsctl.h | 3 +++ > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.20.1 >