From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-fw-52003.amazon.com (smtp-fw-52003.amazon.com [52.119.213.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFD9E253F01 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2025 17:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=52.119.213.152 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743702445; cv=none; b=HVWyX9UUliSWLUa2jVIjivjNj3hwVA+SZqaV1AIDKhFHmXBlZddWAjkYA8iEeiBJV+FlKPTKRPDwgJjhAj1KI8eCzUOykmt6Qh1o2KsJXcFbxvLeeTdkLOyl+127GKB//sQw8zjdFZnoCrbWuwZHOWoDCkXU/2C1K3tPUg5+8lo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743702445; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Iu3+YSJOmRcMjkgw5HwAAi2UidCNk0KpbkI+tnvg+GE=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pnNCM2s+O0pbMzcxBtT5Xd8h1URRoY2EUahxoqjbp4Z0SXIF85YHbTvh6LkuAkRrCR6rrJxnxtDQysNyUl2oprIs4BX1igDguRh0ovRFEMgvaKd+jHtI0lm0axu02wj00DBG1HWzPVCNbei2T31tTqzoBRWNGGuoJn5y0wPy2cI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=amazon.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=amazon.co.jp; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazon.com header.i=@amazon.com header.b=ry6lZkk+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=52.119.213.152 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=amazon.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=amazon.co.jp Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazon.com header.i=@amazon.com header.b="ry6lZkk+" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amazon.com; i=@amazon.com; q=dns/txt; s=amazon201209; t=1743702444; x=1775238444; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ItqibUDue/nvXJeFGIlrYkT9DaDOwFbB4zbDCJzYPS4=; b=ry6lZkk+dlLDZEPjyPFAZTuxgzSGITyeOsewj+53rql5oUgLIS5XWCHl 0TKsVWO2I+Hs484oOSOx0srEWzHawmXsVn0tDyD/3BJkP+3tTfbEOsxMT stTo5XDEgFLogblXmy9NWnr0zRcdW152XaeJ7xhpfJE/Dl2Mvbn5zbnFc 4=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,186,1739836800"; d="scan'208";a="80577388" Received: from iad12-co-svc-p1-lb1-vlan3.amazon.com (HELO smtpout.prod.us-west-2.prod.farcaster.email.amazon.dev) ([10.43.8.6]) by smtp-border-fw-52003.iad7.amazon.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Apr 2025 17:46:56 +0000 Received: from EX19MTAUWC001.ant.amazon.com [10.0.21.151:35396] by smtpin.naws.us-west-2.prod.farcaster.email.amazon.dev [10.0.8.63:2525] with esmtp (Farcaster) id 3124faff-37ef-4d37-a782-1af507d1d671; Thu, 3 Apr 2025 17:46:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Farcaster-Flow-ID: 3124faff-37ef-4d37-a782-1af507d1d671 Received: from EX19D004ANA001.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.138) by EX19MTAUWC001.ant.amazon.com (10.250.64.174) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.2.1544.14; Thu, 3 Apr 2025 17:46:54 +0000 Received: from 6c7e67bfbae3.amazon.com (10.106.101.41) by EX19D004ANA001.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.138) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.2.1544.14; Thu, 3 Apr 2025 17:46:50 +0000 From: Kuniyuki Iwashima To: CC: , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "smb: client: Fix netns refcount imbalance causing leaks and use-after-free" Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 10:46:38 -0700 Message-ID: <20250403174642.96094-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.48.1 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-ClientProxiedBy: EX19D040UWB002.ant.amazon.com (10.13.138.89) To EX19D004ANA001.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.138) From: Steve French Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 12:32:35 -0500 > > What branch should be used to send reverts for -rcX ? > > cifs-2.6.git for-next > > But probably won't be an issue in a few days (since mainline then will > likely include the conflicting patch - which fortunately is unrelated > to this discussion, just fixes an RFC1001 bug) Thanks, then I'd leave v2 as is for now.