linux-cifs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
	samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org>,
	Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>,
	Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>,
	Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>, Bharath SM <bharathsm@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] smb: client: More crypto library conversions
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 09:24:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251017162403.GB1566@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH2r5mtPp6yGFHipzQ6A+6Yi0FZjWZa=T=CrtALc4o6TGqF8EA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 11:12:58AM -0500, Steve French wrote:
> > with SMB 1.0 I get "CIFS: VFS: SMB signature verification
> > returned error = -13",
> 
> If testing SMB1 to Samba the server disabled signing unless I set
>   "server signing = mandatory"
> in smb.conf.  But with that, signing with your patches worked fine even to SMB1
> 
> Were you testing to Samba with SMB1?

As per my cover letter, these are the settings I used:

    Tested with Samba with all SMB versions, with mfsymlinks in the
    mount options, 'server min protocol = NT1' and 'server signing =
    required' in smb.conf, and doing a simple file data and symlink
    verification test.  That seems to cover all the modified code paths.

This was with Samba 4.23.1.

I just tried 'server signing = mandatory' too (just in case that's
different from "required"), and I still get the error.

Anyway, it's not related to my patchset, as it happens regardless of it.
I also tried some much older kernels, and it still happens there too.

- Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-17 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-12  1:57 [PATCH 0/8] smb: client: More crypto library conversions Eric Biggers
2025-10-12  1:57 ` [PATCH 1/8] smb: client: Use SHA-512 library for SMB3.1.1 preauth hash Eric Biggers
2025-10-12  1:57 ` [PATCH 2/8] smb: client: Use HMAC-SHA256 library for key generation Eric Biggers
2025-10-12  1:57 ` [PATCH 3/8] smb: client: Use HMAC-SHA256 library for SMB2 signature calculation Eric Biggers
2025-10-12  1:57 ` [PATCH 4/8] smb: client: Use MD5 library for M-F symlink hashing Eric Biggers
2025-10-12  1:57 ` [PATCH 5/8] smb: client: Use MD5 library for SMB1 signature calculation Eric Biggers
2025-10-12  1:57 ` [PATCH 6/8] smb: client: Use HMAC-MD5 library for NTLMv2 Eric Biggers
2025-10-12  1:57 ` [PATCH 7/8] smb: client: Remove obsolete crypto_shash allocations Eric Biggers
2025-10-12  1:57 ` [PATCH 8/8] smb: client: Consolidate cmac(aes) shash allocation Eric Biggers
2025-10-13 14:44 ` [PATCH 0/8] smb: client: More crypto library conversions Enzo Matsumiya
2025-10-14  6:07   ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-14  3:42 ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-17 16:12   ` Steve French
2025-10-17 16:24     ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2025-10-14  7:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251017162403.GB1566@sol \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=bharathsm@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pc@manguebit.org \
    --cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
    --cc=sfrench@samba.org \
    --cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
    --cc=sprasad@microsoft.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).