From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org>
Cc: <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>, <lkp@intel.com>,
Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>,
ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong@kylinos.cn>,
"David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
<linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>, <samba-technical@lists.samba.org>,
<oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: [linux-next:master] [smb] 40e75e42f4: filebench.sum_operations/s 9.5% improvement
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 21:31:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202604211611.9b649c8a-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
Hello,
kernel test robot noticed a 9.5% improvement of filebench.sum_operations/s on:
commit: 40e75e42f49ca54b4ff41f3edb94f5ef0299140c ("smb: client: fix open handle lookup in cifs_open()")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
testcase: filebench
config: x86_64-rhel-9.4
compiler: gcc-14
test machine: 512 threads 4 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6768P CPU @ 2.4GHz (Granite Rapids) with 128G memory
parameters:
disk: 1SSD
fs: ext4
fs2: cifs
test: webproxy.f
cpufreq_governor: performance
Details are as below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260421/202604211611.9b649c8a-lkp@intel.com
=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/disk/fs2/fs/kconfig/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase:
gcc-14/performance/1SSD/cifs/ext4/x86_64-rhel-9.4/debian-13-x86_64-20250902.cgz/lkp-gnr-4sp2/webproxy.f/filebench
commit:
d4c7210d2f ("smb: client: fix iface port assignment in parse_server_interfaces")
40e75e42f4 ("smb: client: fix open handle lookup in cifs_open()")
d4c7210d2f3ea481 40e75e42f49ca54b4ff41f3edb9
---------------- ---------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
11.25 +8.0% 12.15 filebench.sum_bytes_mb/s
185317 +9.5% 202907 filebench.sum_operations
3088 +9.5% 3381 filebench.sum_operations/s
812.33 +9.5% 889.50 filebench.sum_reads/s
32.28 -8.7% 29.48 filebench.sum_time_ms/op
162.33 +9.5% 177.83 filebench.sum_writes/s
450654 +4.1% 468946 filebench.time.file_system_outputs
65856 ± 2% -5.4% 62305 filebench.time.minor_page_faults
100.50 -37.8% 62.50 ± 2% filebench.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
181.94 -38.1% 112.56 filebench.time.system_time
281234 +8.9% 306129 filebench.time.voluntary_context_switches
12871 +5.7% 13600 vmstat.system.cs
0.31 -0.1 0.22 mpstat.cpu.all.sys%
39.00 ± 18% -97.4% 1.00 mpstat.max_utilization.seconds
0.16 ± 13% -0.0 0.11 ± 18% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.task_tick_idle
0.51 ± 29% +0.5 1.05 ± 58% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.hrtimer_try_to_cancel
0.16 ± 13% -0.0 0.11 ± 17% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.task_tick_idle
18.00 -18.5% 14.67 ± 3% turbostat.Avg_MHz
0.47 -0.1 0.38 turbostat.Busy%
0.44 ± 3% +7.9% 0.48 turbostat.CPU%c1
0.39 +16.8% 0.45 turbostat.IPC
2624523 -4.0% 2519538 turbostat.IRQ
77.69 ± 3% -7.1% 72.19 perf-sched.total_wait_and_delay.average.ms
74994 ± 2% +8.4% 81279 perf-sched.total_wait_and_delay.count.ms
77.37 ± 3% -7.0% 71.96 perf-sched.total_wait_time.average.ms
77.69 ± 3% -7.1% 72.19 perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.[unknown].[unknown].[unknown].[unknown].[unknown]
74994 ± 2% +8.4% 81279 perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.[unknown].[unknown].[unknown].[unknown].[unknown]
77.37 ± 3% -7.0% 71.96 perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.[unknown].[unknown].[unknown].[unknown].[unknown]
7.73e+08 -7.5% 7.152e+08 perf-stat.i.branch-instructions
12690 +5.9% 13433 perf-stat.i.context-switches
9.481e+09 -18.8% 7.696e+09 perf-stat.i.cpu-cycles
3.583e+09 -5.4% 3.389e+09 perf-stat.i.instructions
0.32 +8.1% 0.34 perf-stat.i.ipc
1.48 +0.1 1.61 perf-stat.overall.branch-miss-rate%
2.65 -14.2% 2.27 perf-stat.overall.cpi
3007 ± 6% -19.1% 2433 ± 3% perf-stat.overall.cycles-between-cache-misses
0.38 +16.5% 0.44 perf-stat.overall.ipc
7.704e+08 -7.6% 7.117e+08 perf-stat.ps.branch-instructions
12637 +5.8% 13364 perf-stat.ps.context-switches
9.449e+09 -18.9% 7.659e+09 perf-stat.ps.cpu-cycles
3.57e+09 -5.6% 3.372e+09 perf-stat.ps.instructions
6.534e+11 -5.5% 6.173e+11 perf-stat.total.instructions
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2026-04-22 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202604211611.9b649c8a-lkp@intel.com \
--to=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=chenxiaosong@kylinos.cn \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pc@manguebit.org \
--cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
--cc=stfrench@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox