Linux CIFS filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	patches@lists.linux.dev, Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
	Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
	linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 7.2 02/10] smb: smbdirect: dont wait for RDMA_CM_EVENT_DISCONNECTED in smbdirect_socket_destroy_sync()
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 13:15:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261030121255.317472282@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261030121255.257615100@linuxfoundation.org>

7.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>

[ Upstream commit 4ca76b89917ad5b317e07ae4f0edc16f7c2a1248 ]

smbdirect_socket_destroy_sync() waited for RDMA_CM_EVENT_DISCONNECTED
after smbdirect_socket_cleanup_work() called rdma_disconnect(). That
can take very long, e.g. if the peer just disappeared, until the
rdma cm gives up, or forever if the event already happened, but the
status was overwritten afterwards.

This is not needed: smbdirect_socket_destroy() drains the qp under
rdma_lock_handler(), destroys it and calls rdma_destroy_id(), which
only waits for a currently running event handler and makes sure no
further events are delivered. The rest of the disconnect protocol
(DREQ/DREP and timewait for IB, abrupt close for iWarp) is handled
by the rdma core asynchronously. drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c also just
calls rdma_disconnect() and ib_drain_qp() before rdma_destroy_id().

So smbdirect_socket_destroy() now also accepts
SMBDIRECT_SOCKET_DISCONNECTING and changes the status to
SMBDIRECT_SOCKET_DISCONNECTED itself under rdma_lock_handler().

We could still get RDMA_CM_EVENT_DISCONNECTED in the small
windows between rdma_unlock_handler() and rdma_destroy_id(),
but in that case smbdirect_connection_rdma_event_handler()
is basically a no-op.

Fixes: 422a2436697d ("smb: smbdirect: introduce smbdirect_socket_destroy[_sync]()")
Cc: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Cc: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org>
Cc: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: samba-technical@lists.samba.org
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5-5
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/smb/smbdirect/connection.c | 12 ++++----
 fs/smb/smbdirect/socket.c     | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/smb/smbdirect/connection.c b/fs/smb/smbdirect/connection.c
index fe99537207176..32327f96a03ab 100644
--- a/fs/smb/smbdirect/connection.c
+++ b/fs/smb/smbdirect/connection.c
@@ -83,9 +83,9 @@ static int smbdirect_connection_rdma_event_handler(struct rdma_cm_id *id,
 		 * smbdirect_socket_schedule_cleanup[_status]() =>
 		 * smbdirect_socket_cleanup_work().
 		 *
-		 * As otherwise we'd set SMBDIRECT_SOCKET_DISCONNECTING,
-		 * but never ever get RDMA_CM_EVENT_DISCONNECTED and
-		 * never reach SMBDIRECT_SOCKET_DISCONNECTED.
+		 * As otherwise we'd set SMBDIRECT_SOCKET_DISCONNECTING
+		 * and call rdma_disconnect(), but never ever get
+		 * RDMA_CM_EVENT_DISCONNECTED.
 		 */
 		if (event->event == RDMA_CM_EVENT_DEVICE_REMOVAL)
 			smbdirect_socket_schedule_cleanup_status(sc,
@@ -113,9 +113,9 @@ static int smbdirect_connection_rdma_event_handler(struct rdma_cm_id *id,
 		 * smbdirect_socket_schedule_cleanup_status() =>
 		 * smbdirect_socket_cleanup_work().
 		 *
-		 * As otherwise we'd set SMBDIRECT_SOCKET_DISCONNECTING,
-		 * but never ever get RDMA_CM_EVENT_DISCONNECTED and
-		 * never reach SMBDIRECT_SOCKET_DISCONNECTED.
+		 * As otherwise we'd set SMBDIRECT_SOCKET_DISCONNECTING
+		 * and call rdma_disconnect(), but never ever get
+		 * RDMA_CM_EVENT_DISCONNECTED.
 		 *
 		 * This is also a normal disconnect so
 		 * SMBDIRECT_LOG_INFO should be good enough
diff --git a/fs/smb/smbdirect/socket.c b/fs/smb/smbdirect/socket.c
index bb02df6158b97..c36cb7cc0088b 100644
--- a/fs/smb/smbdirect/socket.c
+++ b/fs/smb/smbdirect/socket.c
@@ -511,7 +511,13 @@ static void smbdirect_socket_destroy(struct smbdirect_socket *sc)
 	if (sc->status == SMBDIRECT_SOCKET_DESTROYED)
 		return;
 
-	WARN_ONCE(sc->status != SMBDIRECT_SOCKET_DISCONNECTED,
+	/*
+	 * smbdirect_socket_destroy_sync() doesn't wait
+	 * for RDMA_CM_EVENT_DISCONNECTED, so we may still
+	 * be in SMBDIRECT_SOCKET_DISCONNECTING
+	 * (or already reached SMBDIRECT_SOCKET_DISCONNECTED)
+	 */
+	WARN_ONCE(sc->status < SMBDIRECT_SOCKET_DISCONNECTING,
 		  "status=%s first_error=%1pe",
 		  smbdirect_socket_status_string(sc->status),
 		  SMBDIRECT_DEBUG_ERR_PTR(sc->first_error));
@@ -542,6 +548,32 @@ static void smbdirect_socket_destroy(struct smbdirect_socket *sc)
 	if (sc->rdma.cm_id)
 		rdma_lock_handler(sc->rdma.cm_id);
 
+	/*
+	 * We hold the handler lock, so the rdma event
+	 * handlers can't change the status anymore.
+	 *
+	 * If RDMA_CM_EVENT_DISCONNECTED didn't arrive yet,
+	 * we just stop waiting for it here.
+	 *
+	 * We already disabled disconnect_work above
+	 * and before we call rdma_unlock_handler below
+	 * we call smbdirect_connection_destroy_qp which
+	 * sets sc->ib.qp = NULL.
+	 *
+	 * Between rdma_unlock_handler() and
+	 * rdma_destroy_id() below there's a small
+	 * windows where RDMA_CM_EVENT_DISCONNECTED
+	 * could still arrive.
+	 *
+	 * But smbdirect_connection_rdma_event_handler
+	 * will be a noop when calling smbdirect_socket_schedule_cleanup*
+	 * ib_drain_qp() also won't be called.
+	 */
+	if (sc->status < SMBDIRECT_SOCKET_DISCONNECTED) {
+		sc->status = SMBDIRECT_SOCKET_DISCONNECTED;
+		smbdirect_socket_wake_up_all(sc);
+	}
+
 	if (sc->ib.qp) {
 		smbdirect_log_rdma_event(sc, SMBDIRECT_LOG_INFO,
 			"drain qp\n");
@@ -679,17 +711,21 @@ void smbdirect_socket_destroy_sync(struct smbdirect_socket *sc)
 		"destroying rdma session\n");
 	if (sc->status < SMBDIRECT_SOCKET_DISCONNECTING)
 		smbdirect_socket_cleanup_work(&sc->disconnect_work);
-	if (sc->status < SMBDIRECT_SOCKET_DISCONNECTED) {
-		smbdirect_log_rdma_event(sc, SMBDIRECT_LOG_INFO,
-			"wait for transport being disconnected\n");
-		wait_event(sc->status_wait, sc->status == SMBDIRECT_SOCKET_DISCONNECTED);
-		smbdirect_log_rdma_event(sc, SMBDIRECT_LOG_INFO,
-			"waited for transport being disconnected\n");
-	}
 
 	/*
-	 * Once we reached SMBDIRECT_SOCKET_DISCONNECTED,
-	 * we should call smbdirect_socket_destroy()
+	 * We don't wait for RDMA_CM_EVENT_DISCONNECTED,
+	 * rdma_disconnect() was already called by
+	 * smbdirect_socket_cleanup_work() if needed
+	 * and smbdirect_socket_destroy() drains the qp,
+	 * destroys it and calls rdma_destroy_id(), which
+	 * only waits for a currently running event handler
+	 * and makes sure no further events are delivered.
+	 * The rest of the disconnect protocol is handled
+	 * by the rdma core asynchronously.
+	 *
+	 * Waiting for RDMA_CM_EVENT_DISCONNECTED could
+	 * take very long or forever, e.g. if the peer
+	 * just disappeared.
 	 */
 	smbdirect_socket_destroy(sc);
 	smbdirect_log_rdma_event(sc, SMBDIRECT_LOG_INFO,
-- 
2.53.0




       reply	other threads:[~2026-10-30 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20261030121255.257615100@linuxfoundation.org>
2026-10-30 12:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2026-10-30 12:15 ` [PATCH 7.2 03/10] smb: smbdirect: release failed pending sockets of a listener Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-10-30 12:42   ` 이성현
2026-10-30 12:15 ` [PATCH 7.2 04/10] smb: smbdirect: dont hand out already failed sockets in smbdirect_socket_accept() Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261030121255.317472282@linuxfoundation.org \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=metze@samba.org \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pc@manguebit.org \
    --cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox