From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AEF312B88 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 09:31:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707125496; cv=none; b=j4UaUo0A3+EQg/JTlhhCjO8zs9rb4JOmxcOLSwigdPbmhMsHPnCXhtYNUwtqavyJgjEPWbJ1jxedJRR12LN2wIW3FwYSDjsC9SIWyOool4K4D+RqoSa9k6nm/Bbel5TN3z00sLWPJT9l2Ov25dBJUqbKooW1DJRLPgX/4B08sk8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707125496; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OzU6mnPFCY7KfvfMk7jsVNmV+vAstFImvWZgLIIZdI0=; h=From:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Date:Message-ID; b=Mq6uvcU6TTSHfLdmK9/SnQ/wWeI2tUV2AWfPqatMkDQPCkBjHQ5xWUCjpTrBt+jDBHOTe3caVG2PX6k1hIDW1erkoxmKboLFyfYv+2x/sxjGLDPjK+PTZslKstcY2a2gMmgG9iggqMlpIq0RHyKcIr2kLuw9VL5y9PcEiXV8CLk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=hikkN9I6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="hikkN9I6" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1707125493; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fxXxV+DkikhaqBYK6PKix9OBGmQ2q8tBOhsrX/dj7zA=; b=hikkN9I68XElTrDX8DMZXSpZnzLDvVSaq56YjWR2raeph+2PjFu1aKG98QGbo++Y2kCkH3 0b6moc5DKCEENMCOaXT091HI4RcMpDUg38ZKee0WD10gVaD1iQYja/+dRXSwmhEcCPJL+o 2y+lgo5mKt+FzNN0z/KKx36owczQnnE= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-690-ytrP5gwBPcOAPPw75N3mGw-1; Mon, 05 Feb 2024 04:31:26 -0500 X-MC-Unique: ytrP5gwBPcOAPPw75N3mGw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00D7D185A784; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 09:31:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (unknown [10.42.28.245]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757F02026D66; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 09:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <3003956.1707125148@warthog.procyon.org.uk> References: <3003956.1707125148@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Steve French , "R. Diez" , linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SMB 1.0 broken between Kernel versions 6.2 and 6.5 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3004196.1707125484.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 09:31:24 +0000 Message-ID: <3004197.1707125484@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.4 David Howells wrote: > > any thoughts whether this could be related to folios/netfs changes? > > Unlikely as you didn't take them for the last merge window, let alone 6.2. That said, you did take my iteratorisation patches in 6.3 - but that shouldn't affect 6.2 unless someone backported them. David