From: VALETTE Eric RD-MAPS-REN <eric2.valette-C0LM0jrOve7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: Linux 3.2.17 and netapp 8.1
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 18:06:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB12D71.3040403@orange.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120514120159.2f6de2fa-4QP7MXygkU+dMjc06nkz3ljfA9RmPOcC@public.gmane.org>
On 05/14/2012 06:01 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2012 14:43:06 +0200
> VALETTE Eric RD-MAPS-REN<eric2.valette-C0LM0jrOve7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Middle of next week, a netapp filer was replaced by a new netapp FAS
>> 3270 with 8.1 firmware. While previously I had no problem accessing, all
>> the share, now, my log is full of CIFS errors preventing me to access my
>> own content:
>>
>> Mount options:
>>
>> domain=ZZZZ,credentials=/xxxx/xxxx/.sambaShareId,uid=yyyyy,gid=zzz,iocharset=utf8,noserverino
>> 0 0
>>
>> Is there any known problem with this netapp firmware?
>>
>> Note that I have other shares on different using different netapp
>> machine with older firmware that work like a charm.
>>
>> -- eric
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________________________________
>> [ 315.788485] CIFS VFS: RFC1001 size 248 smaller than SMB for mid=34
>> [ 315.788493] Bad SMB: : dump of 48 bytes of data at 0xffff880123045c00
>> [ 315.788501] f8000000 424d53ff 00000032 80018800 . . . \xfffffff8
>> \xffffffff S M B 2 . . . . . . .
>> [ 315.788508] 00000000 00000000 00000000 19db0040 . . . . . . . . . .
>> . . @ . \xffffffdb .
>> [ 315.788518] 00220800 c400020a 02000000 00003800 . . " . . . .
>> \xffffffc4 . . . . . 8 . .
>> [ 315.791476] CIFS VFS: RFC1001 size 248 smaller than SMB for mid=35
>> [ 315.791481] Bad SMB: : dump of 48 bytes of data at 0xffff880123045dc0
>> [ 315.791489] f8000000 424d53ff 00000032 80018800 . . . \xfffffff8
>> \xffffffff S M B 2 . . . . . . .
>> [ 315.791495] 00000000 00000000 00000000 19db0040 . . . . . . . . . .
>> . . @ . \xffffffdb .
>> [ 315.791502] 00230800 c400020a 02000000 00003800 . . # . . . .
>> \xffffffc4 . . . . . 8 . .
>> [ 315.791577] CIFS VFS: Unexpected lookup error -5
>> [ 315.794489] CIFS VFS: RFC1001 size 248 smaller than SMB for mid=36
>> [ 315.794495] Bad SMB: : dump of 48 bytes of data at 0xffff880126a8fb80
>> [ 315.794503] f8000000 424d53ff 00000032 80018800 . . . \xfffffff8
>> \xffffffff S M B 2 . . . . . . .
>> [ 315.794510] 00000000 00000000 00000000 19db0040 . . . . . . . . . .
>> . . @ . \xffffffdb .
>> [ 315.794516] 00240800 c400020a 02000000 00003800 . . $ . . . .
>> \xffffffc4 . . . . . 8 . .
>> [ 315.794542] CIFS VFS: Unexpected lookup error -5
>> [ 315.797494] CIFS VFS: RFC1001 size 248 smaller than SMB for mid=37
>> [ 315.797500] Bad SMB: : dump of 48 bytes of data at 0xffff8801115c5880
>> [ 315.797507] f8000000 424d53ff 00000032 80018800 . . . \xfffffff8
>> \xffffffff S M B 2 . . . . . . .
>> [ 315.797514] 00000000 00000000 00000000 19db0040 . . . . . . . . . .
>> . . @ . \xffffffdb .
>> [ 315.797521] 00250800 c400020a 02000000 00003800 . . % . . . .
>> \xffffffc4 . . . . . 8 . .
>> [ 315.797542] CIFS VFS: Unexpected lookup error -5
>>
> I'm not sure, but just to confirm -- that's almost certainly an OnTap
> bug. Those messages mean that the filer is sending back SMB responses
> that have lengths in them that go beyond the end of the frame.
>
> It's almost certainly a similar problem to that reported here:
>
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8914
>
> In the past, netapp has not shown much interest in interoperating with
> clients other than windows. Perhaps though if enough paying customers
> complain they'd be willing to fix it.
>
> I'm also not opposed to sensible workarounds in the client for these
> sorts of bugs, as long as they aren't too invasive or risky. At the end
> of the day though, these are server side bugs and the real fix for this
> problem would have to be done there.
>
Just too follow my own post: Ontrack 8.1 implements SMB 2.1 and in my
traces I see "S M B 2 ". I'm just curious if we do not try to parse
SMB2.1 protocol via CIFS and if ontrack has been correctly configured.
Anyone capable to test with 8.1 on the list?
--
Eric Valette
France Telecom
Recherche& Developpement
Middleware et Plateformes Avancées
Architecte Livebox et Set Top Box
tél : (+33) 2 99 12 45 71
mél :<mailto:Eric2.Valette-C0LM0jrOve7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-14 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-14 12:43 Linux 3.2.17 and netapp 8.1 VALETTE Eric RD-MAPS-REN
[not found] ` <4FB0FDDA.5080604-C0LM0jrOve7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-14 16:01 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20120514120159.2f6de2fa-4QP7MXygkU+dMjc06nkz3ljfA9RmPOcC@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-14 16:06 ` VALETTE Eric RD-MAPS-REN [this message]
[not found] ` <4FB12D71.3040403-C0LM0jrOve7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-14 16:18 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20120514121824.273198a9-4QP7MXygkU+dMjc06nkz3ljfA9RmPOcC@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-14 16:23 ` VALETTE Eric RD-MAPS-REN
[not found] ` <4FB13173.1070509-C0LM0jrOve7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-14 17:15 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20120514131559.7ca0cdc4-4QP7MXygkU+dMjc06nkz3ljfA9RmPOcC@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-14 19:04 ` Don Gray
2012-05-15 7:20 ` VALETTE Eric RD-MAPS-REN
[not found] ` <4FB203AE.3020408-C0LM0jrOve7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-15 13:09 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20120515090907.39197340-9yPaYZwiELC+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-15 13:29 ` VALETTE Eric RD-MAPS-REN
2012-05-15 13:45 ` Suresh Jayaraman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FB12D71.3040403@orange.com \
--to=eric2.valette-c0lm0jrove7qt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jlayton-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox