From: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
Cc: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>,
Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>,
Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] cifs: Rename posix to nfs in parse_reparse_posix() and reparse_posix_data
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 14:52:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5431fa20-089d-4d4e-ba9f-926860d4f202@samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240929092623.yaqhixsa4eot4k62@pali>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1662 bytes --]
On 9/29/24 11:26 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hello Ralph, thank you for information. So in case Samba is not
> going to use IO_REPARSE_TAG_NFS as primary way to serve special
> files, then it still makes sense to do this structure rename with my
> patch?
that's up to Paulo and Steve. I can only talk protocol/spec and server. :)
> Anyway, Windows clients mostly do not use IO_REPARSE_TAG_NFS.
They don't *create* it, but they can *read* and present it. But I guess
that's what you meant.
> From my knowledge on Windows this tag is used only by Windows NFS
> server. So scenario when Windows sends IO_REPARSE_TAG_NFS over SMB
> would be rare... It would be needed to export NFS share via Windows
> NFS server from SMB mount connected to Samba server.
That's out of scope as far as SMB3 POSIX Extensions and I are concerned. :)
> Note that Windows NFS client stores data about special files in EAs.
> So for example if you mount export from Linux NFS server by Windows
> NFS client, then NFS symlink would be visible to Windows
> applications as regular file with "NfsSymlinkTargetName" EA. More
> info is in this email: https://marc.info/?l=samba-
> technical&m=121423255119680
>
> And this is what are Windows applications using if they want to
> access data of special files. So application access
> "NfsSymlinkTargetName" EA and not IO_REPARSE_TAG_NFS reparse tag.
For symlinks SMB3 POSIX Extensions will use what Windows uses natively:
IO_REPARSE_TAG_SYMLINK.
> To my knowledge neither Samba, nor Linux CIFS client supports
> "NfsSymlinkTargetName" EA for creating or parsing symlink.
for Samba: yup.
-slow
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 840 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-29 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-28 21:59 [PATCH 0/8] cifs: Fix support for NFS-style reparse points Pali Rohár
2024-09-28 21:59 ` [PATCH 1/8] smb: Update comments about some reparse point tags Pali Rohár
2024-09-28 21:59 ` [PATCH 2/8] cifs: Remove intermediate object of failed create reparse call Pali Rohár
2024-09-29 12:53 ` Pali Rohár
2024-09-29 14:03 ` [PATCH v2] " Pali Rohár
2024-09-29 16:01 ` Steve French
2024-09-30 15:25 ` [PATCH 2/8] " Paulo Alcantara
2024-09-30 17:20 ` Pali Rohár
2024-09-30 21:33 ` Paulo Alcantara
2024-09-30 20:25 ` [PATCH v3] " Pali Rohár
2024-09-30 21:33 ` Steve French
2024-09-28 21:59 ` [PATCH 3/8] cifs: Fix parsing NFS-style char/block devices Pali Rohár
2024-09-28 21:59 ` [PATCH 4/8] cifs: Fix creating " Pali Rohár
2024-09-29 0:18 ` Steve French
2024-09-29 0:44 ` Pali Rohár
[not found] ` <CAH2r5mvbUhcW_c46oUiHzfPg97n5qiRg9kzpCkmzG9uHygOF3g@mail.gmail.com>
2024-09-29 0:51 ` Pali Rohár
2024-09-28 21:59 ` [PATCH 5/8] cifs: Fix buffer overflow when parsing NFS reparse points Pali Rohár
2024-09-29 10:22 ` [PATCH v2] " Pali Rohár
2024-09-28 21:59 ` [PATCH 6/8] cifs: Do not convert delimiter when parsing NFS-style symlinks Pali Rohár
2024-09-28 21:59 ` [PATCH 7/8] cifs: Validate content of NFS reparse point buffer Pali Rohár
2024-09-28 21:59 ` [PATCH 8/8] cifs: Rename posix to nfs in parse_reparse_posix() and reparse_posix_data Pali Rohár
2024-09-29 4:57 ` Steve French
2024-09-29 9:09 ` Ralph Boehme
2024-09-29 9:26 ` Pali Rohár
2024-09-29 12:52 ` Ralph Boehme [this message]
2024-09-29 15:43 ` Steve French
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5431fa20-089d-4d4e-ba9f-926860d4f202@samba.org \
--to=slow@samba.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=pc@manguebit.com \
--cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
--cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox