From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Two inodes with the same inode number
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 13:19:59 +0100
Message-ID: <55F2C6EF.1000301@citrix.com>
References: <55F298A8.3020509@citrix.com>
 <OF92BF934E.57059FCD-ON85257EBD.003EE076-85257EBD.003EF852@notes.teradyne.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: <linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
To: <john.jackson-hxIV5DHgdjlWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Return-path: <linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <OF92BF934E.57059FCD-ON85257EBD.003EE076-85257EBD.003EF852-zEFU6UmHGhYZPXhiTVDvSdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Sender: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
List-ID: <linux-cifs.vger.kernel.org>

On 09/11/2015 12:27 PM, john.jackson-hxIV5DHgdjlWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org wrote:
> Peter,  reading this person complaint regarding cifs further leads me to
> believe that the synology server may have problems managing inode numbers.
>

Just to be clear, my problem is on the client side since unmounting and 
remounting the share fixes the issue.

Thanks,
-- 
Ross Lagerwall