From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from matoro.tk (matoro.tk [104.188.251.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B6EA1754B for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2024 22:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=104.188.251.153 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726353051; cv=none; b=G1mW+MosaXbMiiitKQd6Qkd5H1ctEoJ0Z6l5nMAK58jbmpU3KOIx7x+FmmGQh9WsEoY5ZOn+MK92hMvAWr3VtBpxx6Zu+wNYuskjTx3nlTVWAMdxost/4DgcRCFo4FRKZB4NnhAVnnGuQShCDCcsNnF3EkyXRXxO4YG/rz4zQR8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726353051; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JH2DH+d4lVqlrFnMBgF6HnYi6w0UaxjbMOaBR8KrmFQ=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=g+fzaHIDcjvVpHgNhdLZ1CKYfwLX3Dkt0a1/Z1Vy5flzbaP5M3OE9jBEnU+MBQBGN+Tt8VeX48gpaRzoP5LfbB4voi8gk8HdE2pYUm9Mq+4DfJjyKD+MYTNhubk8vN3vbpss/8WFSsILyIWGc36koyc+48eSM/NBPNvsHCAsxtY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=matoro.tk; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=matoro.tk; dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=matoro.tk header.i=@matoro.tk header.b=KDWt+e3w; arc=none smtp.client-ip=104.188.251.153 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=matoro.tk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=matoro.tk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=matoro.tk header.i=@matoro.tk header.b="KDWt+e3w" DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=V1OlKuB3O3pTTQ7qA55blm1tjsdN3HNQYpeN0ArbgFA=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=matoro.tk; h=Subject:Subject:Sender:To:To:Cc:Cc:From:From:Date:Date:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Message-Id:References:References:Autocrypt:Openpgp; i=@matoro.tk; s=20240828; t=1726352126; v=1; x=1726784126; b=KDWt+e3wN4MD7zi4MDDNLO+j4+Cx86x2nolB0qibsDAUjd0PqCKVRmIL4P08kq5lFTJDJqnQ ksJOZSkepNynEHKubxPFTekpz5y8C94KqSgWQSZ7WfKyEotbRGv4prYNDfNaBmSIQesEwU8HSQz VG7mVWuCBqgjUg0oD+DeV+mY9Xc4OHWKF3MUVvKbBAGrw2aCAA5vyqS5y0B1QHDlY3P6YxLYleQ QkE3xyiyGWz89bOiWF9MjBNCTZA84e+/+hn4k35OmY7rEvl6Dr1FcNJAm6R8X3Gz2egBI522O9L RHlvvoVhwGi2U7i3UorKZxFsezc0GmOh85sWOpLx/nUXy28AFhAl97rQK8jIz32IPk2Db/Fvo0I KqVG52XkAiqRE2OzATevtqZyZQjP86T4OeKGde0zmUy6IbL1WlHDv8dFqjGlP/FKGc/J5YBtCe0 A70tL/OyG8c6vrBG60TIeOmdfqdJ7wPK5mFUYHLxV2jWQ+eIZ+A3U0dVrGQ3WvAFkHyPg5Ezvgq Xndncx3M6lZfE0QLWgtAGPIw42e66gwv1XLqjN7fNFFLREgFnpMs3XVhGp//x2NFOVWmaK9pHeV DRubpVnoqBz9NfIRkQJGzNsFSc0xg/tUtGwS1glWl5MWuJYe3vVhVu+lDVyg+ikfOO1wOAWKSRp g7YY+Mpj/Q4= Received: by matoro.tk (envelope-sender ) with ESMTPS id 274e23fa; Sat, 14 Sep 2024 18:15:26 -0400 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 18:15:26 -0400 From: matoro To: "Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)" Cc: David Howells , Steve French , Bruno Haible , Linux Cifs Subject: Re: CIFS lockup regression on SMB1 in 6.10 In-Reply-To: <97a71be9-d274-4e9e-9928-dce062ba2a22@moonlit-rail.com> References: <4c563891-973c-46a4-8964-0ef90b1c7e49@moonlit-rail.com> <90134f35-acb3-4124-b172-2de6d70dd0b4@moonlit-rail.com> <2925a37f946d1b96a7251f7be72ba341@matoro.tk> <2322699.1725442054@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <97a71be9-d274-4e9e-9928-dce062ba2a22@moonlit-rail.com> Message-ID: <693dc625d6be7f0154bcb5e4ee6a3561@matoro.tk> X-Sender: matoro_mailinglist_kernel@matoro.tk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 2024-09-05 11:40, Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) wrote: > Kris Karas wrote: >> David Howells wrote: >>> The attached may help. >> >> Thanks.  Gave it a whirl.  Alas, FTBFS against 6.10.8: > > OK, I tried this against git master, compiles fine there. > Success! The lockup with vers=1.0/unix is gone for me. > > Just need a backport for 6.10.x to fix the missing NETFS_SREQ_HIT_EOF and > rdata->actual_len. > > Thanks! > Kris Hey, I haven't tested this myself but if it fixes the issue for others, is there any way this can go into tip so that it lands in 6.11?