From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F76CA9EC3 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 09:20:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67DD20862 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 09:20:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726884AbfJaJUc (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Oct 2019 05:20:32 -0400 Received: from rigel.uberspace.de ([95.143.172.238]:49982 "EHLO rigel.uberspace.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726864AbfJaJUc (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Oct 2019 05:20:32 -0400 Received: (qmail 9749 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2019 09:20:30 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO webmail.rigel.uberspace.de) (127.0.0.1) by ::1 with SMTP; 31 Oct 2019 09:20:30 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 10:20:28 +0100 From: Moritz M To: Pavel Shilovsky Cc: linux-cifs Subject: Re: Possible timeout problem when opening a file twice on a SMB mount In-Reply-To: References: <61d3d6774247fe6159456b249dbc3c63@moritzmueller.ee> <4a017b583eb0f5fab477ecbe0e43b3a1@moritzmueller.ee> <6492326ef9d8d1a9401fac243160646f@moritzmueller.ee> Message-ID: <6a49aa3e2cf17975efc5259f94c01ce7@moritzmueller.ee> X-Sender: mailinglist@moritzmueller.ee Sender: linux-cifs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Hi Pavel, Am 2019-10-30 22:51, schrieb Pavel Shilovsky: > I think there is a difference in your setup between v5.2.21 and v5.3.7 > kernels. I found the issue in oplock break processing that can happen > if you have several shares from the same server mounted on the client. I think you are right. Usually I mount multiple shares from one server. It could had happened that I tested it with just one share mounted when using the v5.2 Kernel. > Could you test the patch to see if it works for your environment? I did and it worked ;) Thanks.