From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E86F4C433EF for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2022 23:47:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244383AbiCSXtP (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Mar 2022 19:49:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55660 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243922AbiCSXtP (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Mar 2022 19:49:15 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEC82668 for ; Sat, 19 Mar 2022 16:47:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1647733670; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6n/sDsvAuIPEifJSzKj64MzdJQCs8pJY1Y2N6jUReiU=; b=XveLb+ieaeNF9YK+mYhANFKiWyBbxSQ7JFcfhHjidVECUuheVRgCoVAozSFHJjtQeKDVaX hSzFQTxBUu2MHhLBlocMwrZBy/7wuJCBgYDz8RXLjvJnxiRnZ7Rn3Q8oxKn5Mz9iEqduZr RYyIvG4omDfca+GuTjaAAIi9oyy4yLk= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-313-CVtg9R1OMg6ffmTpYKYm1Q-1; Sat, 19 Mar 2022 19:47:47 -0400 X-MC-Unique: CVtg9R1OMg6ffmTpYKYm1Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A6B6811E76; Sat, 19 Mar 2022 23:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (unknown [10.33.36.19]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E10C40CF8F2; Sat, 19 Mar 2022 23:47:45 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <751829.1647648125@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Ilya Dryomov Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Jeff Layton , Xiubo Li , Linus Torvalds , Ceph Development , linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel , LKML Subject: Re: Coordinating netfslib pull request with the ceph pull request MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <824347.1647733664.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2022 23:47:44 +0000 Message-ID: <824348.1647733664@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.11.54.1 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Ilya Dryomov wrote: > Given how your branch is structured, it sounds like the easiest would > be for you to send the netfslib pull request after I send the ceph pull > request. Or do you have some tighter coordination in mind? I think that's sufficient - or if I sent mine first, I can put in a big note at the top saying it depends on yours, when you decide to post it. David