From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
Bharath SM <bharathsm@microsoft.com>,
Shyam Prasad N <nspmangalore@gmail.com>,
Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>,
Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] keys: Miscellaneous fixes/changes
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:16:08 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d532de2-bf3a-dee4-1cad-e11714e914d0@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wh1b0r+5SnwWedx=J4aZhRif1HLN_moxEG9Jzy23S6QUA@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/21/23 12:48?PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 9:43?AM David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> (1) Fix request_key() so that it doesn't cache a looked up key on the
>> current thread if that thread is a kernel thread. The cache is
>> cleared during notify_resume - but that doesn't happen in kernel
>> threads. This is causing cifs DNS keys to be un-invalidateable.
>
> I've pulled this, but I'd like people to look a bit more at this.
>
> The issue with TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME is that it is only done on return to
> user space.
>
> And these days, PF_KTHREAD isn't the only case that never returns to
> user space. PF_IO_WORKER has the exact same behaviour.
>
> Now, to counteract this, as of this merge window (and marked for
> stable) IO threads do a fake "return to user mode" handling in
> io_run_task_work(), and so I think we're all good, but I'd like people
> to at least think about this.
I haven't seen the patch yet as it hasn't been pushed, but can imagine
what it looks like. It may make sense to add some debug check for
PF_KTHREAD having TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME set, or task_work pending for that
matter, as that is generally not workable without doing something to
handle it explicitly.
For PF_IO_WORKER, with the commit you mentioned, those threads should
deal with TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME just fine. Until something else gets added
that is also run from exit_to_user_mode...
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-21 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-21 16:43 [GIT PULL] keys: Miscellaneous fixes/changes David Howells
2023-03-21 18:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-03-21 19:16 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2023-03-21 19:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-03-21 19:32 ` Jens Axboe
2023-03-21 19:12 ` pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8d532de2-bf3a-dee4-1cad-e11714e914d0@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bharathsm@microsoft.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nspmangalore@gmail.com \
--cc=rharwood@redhat.com \
--cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox