From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92683199EAD for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:39:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731947976; cv=none; b=totlY8n8+k6Hrka2OPJAY6C+vCB7yfoTpv9SmTa6Vjp6nyOS4lobCQcmhiGrpw8z4xCaR15pDU+VprfSXRnyUBVnky344S68+SafIHY/Arel8hJYC/6AufRDk7CUcp275qsdMC0TB2ZLNZJlO8NETeMDEiVoZL2tHL02I8jCfSg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731947976; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4VLAsz3gLkTJFtFpCPDvTF204CR43uOYtq/o7M5cR6I=; h=From:In-Reply-To:References:To:Cc:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Date:Message-ID; b=ooa4XOYkbQXBQpoz+hyt13Aq/Y35ziEkNKDNzH6NLGN5Kq1xj+xFMn9RiknY9N7PPpk/RTWnRlty71IphYx28eVGDJbP7jZFjPaSniZwjmLkDhElSyBEiVa1uHz6uYsNaxqdmM7wjyt9MFgFcAHwD38Lp2UBpyBGUE3FsdYh0/k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=hCuE6eZJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="hCuE6eZJ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1731947973; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5TBgXpcOkE91KJWIrvCU0ksBJeSHSjTfC1vv3ct4vww=; b=hCuE6eZJTMSe4Z8s5t+ekFa+ZeEvxTeto7bVLlXWzkAJBeE/Ck+bctwGHmM7T4nvMgssUz hkGypEORbZ690Oot/J9DWr6AEyaWBIVf8qgKGQZYi3KXwCT/NabwRNS7DbJzzeNEgAUsxp xP+xrq+X2iOPiW9Un0+/PCX3smZ3D/Q= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-226-r1Nbp_NqPiyaaS_1Yh73TA-1; Mon, 18 Nov 2024 11:39:32 -0500 X-MC-Unique: r1Nbp_NqPiyaaS_1Yh73TA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: r1Nbp_NqPiyaaS_1Yh73TA Received: from mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6604A19560BA; Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:39:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (unknown [10.42.28.207]) by mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E035195607C; Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:39:21 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <20241108173236.1382366-1-dhowells@redhat.com> <20241108173236.1382366-8-dhowells@redhat.com> To: Kees Bakker Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Christian Brauner , Steve French , Matthew Wilcox , Jeff Layton , Gao Xiang , Dominique Martinet , Marc Dionne , Paulo Alcantara , Shyam Prasad N , Tom Talpey , Eric Van Hensbergen , Ilya Dryomov , netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/33] netfs: Abstract out a rolling folio buffer implementation Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <941711.1731947960.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:39:20 +0000 Message-ID: <941712.1731947960@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.15 Kees Bakker wrote: > > + wreq->buffer.iter = wreq->buffer.iter; > Is this correct, an assignment to itself? That should just be removed. Both branches of the preceding if-statement set it. David