From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 092F113C3F5 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 10:36:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713350191; cv=none; b=ZmTWNRknJsKyfB0ByCXz/eJ1heoZN55t/nwiOo8NLNj8j/JnYEMD7u2oJTrifSUcFTAjvx10RcG7sbMwEDMM8rT7pF/OwdWJj1QHuPMkbJ53iTkZDzRoDOwqbpu969+1eEfWsVaFacl7sx14X3IQNJ27zxcWsqfeLbF+53xtTbI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713350191; c=relaxed/simple; bh=l3AYSJ/+mdg3v48SneVucrIzOcn2/tdaJ1WQ9uXh3tk=; h=From:In-Reply-To:References:To:Cc:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Date:Message-ID; b=Pfpmsj3Aytv3fswagxIPqdesbUmcVVJj9XsDYhrx90HeP0YFm8sg/xHpIzI0aWu0gx/sdHgCzcacMz9dlIUs6dUQJWpUDZ0SksMzq4sWiU7OnrXBumsNGT1ik3g5e8ktRH0phm74tgx2nRG/6c1N8+6v2baJXFhS4CTOCt6/lD0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=J/8vbE0n; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="J/8vbE0n" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1713350189; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oIJdAoOJD1/uhXCiQOPpdfvotOmhyFiedfiW/yeHsWQ=; b=J/8vbE0nNSKjuMP30YLYGyvay/5gMksRMztozo/r0pTVoCAKQXo+T2sM33xqHH9XUP2Y7J 3uY1y3Y7x+4GWh/qTXkzdIDdvB2Srs+M9w65qJoefkuUOOWGZ2eNFmtdRb8oEdt1OOFG1u nP2h7FaH8qP49lKG00sAGQWW1ofVzls= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-361-tzkEwGWLMWac2hfcSazMmA-1; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 06:36:24 -0400 X-MC-Unique: tzkEwGWLMWac2hfcSazMmA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65AB738041CC; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 10:36:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (unknown [10.42.28.200]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FDF82026962; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 10:36:20 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <87d451ff8cd030a380b522b4dfc56ca42c9de444.camel@kernel.org> References: <87d451ff8cd030a380b522b4dfc56ca42c9de444.camel@kernel.org> <20240328163424.2781320-1-dhowells@redhat.com> <20240328163424.2781320-25-dhowells@redhat.com> To: Jeff Layton Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Christian Brauner , Gao Xiang , Dominique Martinet , Matthew Wilcox , Steve French , Marc Dionne , Paulo Alcantara , Shyam Prasad N , Tom Talpey , Eric Van Hensbergen , Ilya Dryomov , netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Latchesar Ionkov , Christian Schoenebeck Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/26] netfs: Remove the old writeback code Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <98240.1713350175.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:36:15 +0100 Message-ID: <98241.1713350175@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.4 Jeff Layton wrote: > #23 and #24 should probably be merged. I don't see any reason to do the > two-step of ifdef'ing out the code and then removing it. Just go for it > at this point in the series. I would prefer to keep the ~500 line patch that's rearranging the plumbing separate from the ~1200 line patch that just deletes a load of lines to make the cutover patch easier to review. I guess that comes down to a matter of preference. David