From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Volker Lendecke Subject: Re: cifs client timeouts and hard/soft mounts Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 05:34:54 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20101203212811.17594274@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <20101205210634.602b076b@corrin.poochiereds.net> Reply-To: Volker.Lendecke-PS7XAnAlDA+VvDNblw4Uiw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff Layton , linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, cifs-protocol-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, samba-technical-w/Ol4Ecudpl8XjKLYN78aQ@public.gmane.org To: Steve French Return-path: Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 05:34:54 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Hi! On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 08:16:46PM -0600, Steve French wrote: > I am more worried about firewall rule changes and similar events > than about broken servers - but the idea of waiting forever on stat > to a server that is never going to respond seems odd. That would be a strange fw rule that allows SMBEcho but not other SMB requests. I think if someone puts up such a silly rule, some pain is deserved :-) Volker