From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8BECDB465 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 15:45:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233788AbjJPPpE (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2023 11:45:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38492 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233750AbjJPPo7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2023 11:44:59 -0400 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3428EE; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 08:44:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6D9AC433C9; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 15:44:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1697471097; bh=9uoP06owwVRPrncswrsWLKQbhdyottu9QKK6JcK20LE=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=guJwgvZhq0+Zrw5QhtmZPfW4yFn8mNZ3GKIUOfnH3zVXd6BdPrVmytwdm6n34W6H+ uih7zQPbYtKSkKjvX12X1J6ek6B8zzyXJmn5eqCg4IwuAOyGQx0jYQm2qMdPvM8/h/ okldncECKsUqeuslP3yRlKRpYtmuaVcKD5u1KKqN2qwhjDfbBPvqTsK/ImpYNzfBlg PwVq3fw8lT9Q+P+Xe/3V3jnUzY1Z8OYfP7nIEisoCu/s7myl43v1Xj0uocnCQRhAOa YW7F5nUwox2yNFVjc7qjLqmSSl+50CYdhXz3UikmW97Uk9eWg86Lnbks1taiDu1Lou AzOuWKDg8Q4fA== Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/53] netfs: Note nonblockingness in the netfs_io_request struct From: Jeff Layton To: David Howells , Steve French Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Marc Dionne , Paulo Alcantara , Ronnie Sahlberg , Shyam Prasad N , Tom Talpey , Dominique Martinet , Ilya Dryomov , Christian Brauner , linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 11:44:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20231013155727.2217781-4-dhowells@redhat.com> References: <20231013155727.2217781-1-dhowells@redhat.com> <20231013155727.2217781-4-dhowells@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 (3.48.4-1.fc38) MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2023-10-13 at 16:56 +0100, David Howells wrote: > Allow O_NONBLOCK to be noted in the netfs_io_request struct. Also add a > flag, NETFS_RREQ_BLOCKED to record if we did block. >=20 > Signed-off-by: David Howells > cc: Jeff Layton > cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com > cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org > cc: linux-mm@kvack.org > --- > fs/netfs/objects.c | 2 ++ > include/linux/netfs.h | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) >=20 > diff --git a/fs/netfs/objects.c b/fs/netfs/objects.c > index 85f428fc52e6..e41f9fc9bdd2 100644 > --- a/fs/netfs/objects.c > +++ b/fs/netfs/objects.c > @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ struct netfs_io_request *netfs_alloc_request(struct add= ress_space *mapping, > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rreq->subrequests); > refcount_set(&rreq->ref, 1); > __set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_IN_PROGRESS, &rreq->flags); > + if (file && file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) > + __set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_NONBLOCK, &rreq->flags); > if (rreq->netfs_ops->init_request) { > ret =3D rreq->netfs_ops->init_request(rreq, file); > if (ret < 0) { > diff --git a/include/linux/netfs.h b/include/linux/netfs.h > index 282511090ead..b92e982ac4a0 100644 > --- a/include/linux/netfs.h > +++ b/include/linux/netfs.h > @@ -205,6 +205,8 @@ struct netfs_io_request { > #define NETFS_RREQ_DONT_UNLOCK_FOLIOS 3 /* Don't unlock the folios on co= mpletion */ > #define NETFS_RREQ_FAILED 4 /* The request failed */ > #define NETFS_RREQ_IN_PROGRESS 5 /* Unlocked when the request completes= */ > +#define NETFS_RREQ_NONBLOCK 6 /* Don't block if possible (O_NONBLOCK) *= / > +#define NETFS_RREQ_BLOCKED 7 /* We blocked */ > const struct netfs_request_ops *netfs_ops; > }; > =20 >=20 I'd prefer to see this patch squashed in with the first patches that actually check for these flags. I can't look at this patch alone and tell how it'll be used. --=20 Jeff Layton