From: Nicolas Baranger <nicolas.baranger@3xo.fr>
To: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
hch@lst.de, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [netfs/cifs - Linux 6.14] loop on file cat + file copy when files are on CIFS share
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 09:40:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af401afc7e32d9c0eeb6b36da70d2488@3xo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bb5f1ed84df1686aebdba5d60ab0e162@3xo.fr>
Hi Paolo
Thanks again for help.
I'm sorry, I made a mistake in my answer yesterday:
> After a lot of testing, the mounts buffers values: rsize=65536,
> wsize=65536, bsize=16777216,...
The actual values in /etc/fstab are:
rsize=4194304,wsize=4194304,bsize=16777216
But negociated values in /proc/mounts are:
rsize=65536,wsize=65536,bsize=16777216
And don't know if it's related but I have:
grep -i maxbuf /proc/fs/cifs/DebugData
CIFSMaxBufSize: 16384
I've just force a manual 'mount -o remount' and now I have in
/proc/mounts the good values (SMB version is 3.1.1).
Where does this behavior comes from ?
After some search, it appears that when the CIFS share is mounted by
systemd option x-systemd.automount (for example doing 'ls' in the mount
point directory), negociated values are:
rsize=65536,wsize=65536,bsize=16777216
If I umount / remount manually, the negociated values are those defined
in /etc/fstab !
Don't know if it's a normal behavior but it is a source of errors /
mistake and makes troubleshooting performance issues harder
Kind regards
Nicolas
Le 2025-04-23 18:28, Nicolas Baranger a écrit :
> Hi Paolo
>
> Thanks for answer, all explanations and help
>
> I'm happy you found those 2 bugs and starting to patch them.
> Reading your answer, I want to remember that I already found a bug in
> cifs DIO starting from Linux 6.10 (when cifs statring to use netfs to
> do its IO) and it was fixed by David and Christoph
> full story here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/14271ed82a5be7fcc5ceea5f68a10bbd@manguebit.com/T/
>
>> I've noticed that you disabled caching with 'cache=none', is there any
>> particular reason for that?
>
> Yes, it's related with the precedent use case describes in the other
> bug:
> For backuping servers, I've got some KSMBD cifs share on which there
> are some 4TB+ sparses files (back-files) which are LUKS + BTRFS
> formatted.
> The cifs share is mounted on servers and each server mount its own
> back-file as a block device and make its backup inside this crypted
> disk file
> Due to performance issues, it is required that the disk files are using
> 4KB block and are mounted in servers using losetup DIO option (+ 4K
> block size options)
> When I use something else than 'cache=none', sometimes the BTRFS
> filesystem on the back file get corrupted and I also need to mount the
> BTRFS filesystem with 'space_cache=v2' to avoid filesystem corruption
>
>> Have you also set rsize, wsize and bsize mount options? If so, why?
>
> After a lot of testing, the mounts buffers values: rsize=65536,
> wsize=65536, bsize=16777216, are the one which provide the best
> performances with no corruptions on the back-file filesystem and with
> these options a ~2TB backup is possible in few hours during timeframe
> ~1 -> ~5 AM each night
>
> For me it's important that kernel async DIO on netfs continue to work
> as it's used by all my production backup system (transfer speed ratio
> compared with and without DIO is between 10 to 25)
>
> I will try the patch "[PATCH] netfs: Fix setting of transferred bytes
> with short DIO reads", thanks
>
> Let me know if you need further explanations,
>
> Kind regards
> Nicolas Baranger
>
> Le 2025-04-22 01:45, Paulo Alcantara a écrit :
>
> Nicolas Baranger <nicolas.baranger@3xo.fr> writes:
>
> If you need more traces or details on (both?) issues :
>
> - 1) infinite loop issue during 'cat' or 'copy' since Linux 6.14.0
>
> - 2) (don't know if it's related) the very high number of several bytes
> TCP packets transmitted in SMB transaction (more than a hundred) for a
> 5
> bytes file transfert under Linux 6.13.8
> According to your mount options and network traces, cat(1) is
> attempting
> to read 16M from 'toto' file, in which case netfslib will create 256
> subrequests to handle 64K (rsize=65536) reads from 'toto' file.
>
> The first 64K read at offset 0 succeeds and server returns 5 bytes, the
> client then sets NETFS_SREQ_HIT_EOF to indicate that this subrequest
> hit
> the EOF. The next subrequests will still be processed by netfslib and
> sent to the server, but they all fail with STATUS_END_OF_FILE.
>
> So, the problem is with short DIO reads in netfslib that are not being
> handled correctly. It is returning a fixed number of bytes read to
> every read(2) call in your cat command, 16711680 bytes which is the
> offset of last subrequest. This will make cat(1) retry forever as
> netfslib is failing to return the correct number of bytes read,
> including EOF.
>
> While testing a potential fix, I also found other problems with DIO in
> cifs.ko, so I'm working with Dave to get the proper fixes for both
> netfslib and cifs.ko.
>
> I've noticed that you disabled caching with 'cache=none', is there any
> particular reason for that?
>
> Have you also set rsize, wsize and bsize mount options? If so, why?
>
> If you want to keep 'cache=none', then a possible workaround for you
> would be making rsize and wsize always greater than bsize. The default
> values (rsize=4194304,wsize=4194304,bsize=1048576) would do it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-24 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-24 10:40 [netfs/cifs - Linux 6.14] loop on file cat + file copy when files are on CIFS share Nicolas Baranger
2025-03-27 11:15 ` Nicolas Baranger
2025-03-28 10:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-04 8:50 ` Nicolas Baranger
2025-04-04 13:54 ` Paulo Alcantara
2025-04-10 8:43 ` Nicolas Baranger
2025-04-15 18:28 ` Paulo Alcantara
2025-04-17 10:10 ` Nicolas Baranger
2025-04-21 23:45 ` Paulo Alcantara
2025-04-23 16:28 ` Nicolas Baranger
2025-04-24 7:40 ` Nicolas Baranger [this message]
2025-04-24 8:39 ` Nicolas Baranger
2025-04-24 14:25 ` Paulo Alcantara
2025-05-06 22:53 ` Paulo Alcantara
2025-05-07 15:58 ` Nicolas Baranger
2025-04-24 13:58 ` Steve French
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af401afc7e32d9c0eeb6b36da70d2488@3xo.fr \
--to=nicolas.baranger@3xo.fr \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pc@manguebit.com \
--cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox