From: Enzo Matsumiya <ematsumiya@suse.de>
To: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org>
Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linkinjeon@kernel.org,
ronniesahlberg@gmail.com, sprasad@microsoft.com, tom@talpey.com,
bharathsm@microsoft.com, henrique.carvalho@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] smb: client: prevent premature discard of requests if reconnecting
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2026 14:02:43 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <asZ12ZKIHpc5yPsn@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00e0fcdfdde0a281ed3f080040d6fb63@manguebit.org>
On 10/06, Paulo Alcantara wrote:
>Note that there's currently no backoff mechanism in either CIFS or
>netfslib for writeback, meaning that the write requests will be retried
>forever if the server goes offline. You'll end up with tasks hanging
>forever on close or fsync. Trying to fix that in the reconnect path
>doesn't seem the right way to do it, IMO.
Btw, I forgot perhaps the most important bit here -- whenever there's
a reconnect during a write, the file gets corrupted.
That's regardless of how long the downtime was. As soon as the first
task times out in cifs_wait_for_server_reconnect(), returning
-EHOSTDOWN, that request is lost, and data is corrupted.
Note that the writes (operations) _are_ resumed, but what was lost,
stays lost.
Again, I agree that retrying indefinitely might be wrong, but so is
corrupting data due to a short network outage.
I did try to relieve this situation with this patch, and TBH, after
reassessing it, I fail to see how/where this could be handled in netfs
or cifs I/O path.
The closest I got to a PoC was by loosening the restrictions to set
NETFS_SREQ_NEED_RETRY on smb2_writev_callback() and smb2_async_writev(),
and then we're obviously back to the retry-forever-but-no-corruption
dilemma.
Cheers,
Enzo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-07 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 17:03 [PATCH v3 1/2] smb: client: fast fail sends if need to reconnect Enzo Matsumiya
2026-09-29 17:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] smb: client: prevent premature discard of requests if reconnecting Enzo Matsumiya
2026-10-06 19:48 ` Paulo Alcantara
2026-10-06 21:00 ` Enzo Matsumiya
2026-10-06 22:51 ` Paulo Alcantara
2026-10-07 15:04 ` Enzo Matsumiya
2026-10-07 23:25 ` Paulo Alcantara
2026-10-07 17:02 ` Enzo Matsumiya [this message]
2026-10-07 23:35 ` Paulo Alcantara
2026-10-06 18:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] smb: client: fast fail sends if need to reconnect Paulo Alcantara
2026-10-06 18:52 ` Enzo Matsumiya
2026-10-08 18:30 ` Enzo Matsumiya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=asZ12ZKIHpc5yPsn@suse.de \
--to=ematsumiya@suse.de \
--cc=bharathsm@microsoft.com \
--cc=henrique.carvalho@suse.com \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pc@manguebit.org \
--cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
--cc=sprasad@microsoft.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox