Linux CIFS filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: matoro <matoro_mailinglist_kernel@matoro.tk>
To: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Cifs <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>, Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org>
Subject: Re: CIFS lockup regression on SMB1 in 6.10
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 17:22:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf5a6d9797f33d256b9fffeb79014242@matoro.tk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH2r5msAXgYs7=5D=YxGa8XohegJwpTn6yasVyZCmPmPt1QA9w@mail.gmail.com>

On 2024-08-15 15:37, Steve French wrote:
> Do you have any data on whether this still fails with current Linux
> kernel (6.11-rc3 e.g.)?
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 1:08 PM matoro
> <matoro_mailinglist_kernel@matoro.tk> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all, I run a service where user home directories are mounted over SMB1
>> with unix extensions.  After upgrading to kernel 6.10 it was reported to me
>> that users were observing lockups when performing compilations in their 
>> home
>> directories.  I investigated and confirmed this to be the case.  It would
>> cause the build processes to get stuck in I/O.  After the lockup triggered
>> then all further reads/writes to the CIFS-mounted directory would get 
>> stuck.
>> Even the df(1) command would block indefinitely.  Shutdown was also 
>> prevented
>> as the directory could no longer be unmounted.
>> 
>> Triggering the issue is a little bit tricky.  I used compiling cpython as a
>> test case.  Parallel compilation does not seem to be required to trigger 
>> it,
>> because in some tests the hang would occur during ./configure phase, but it
>> does seem to provoke it more easily, as the most common point where the
>> lockup was observed was immediately after "make -j4".  However, sometimes 
>> it
>> would take 10+ minutes of ongoing compilation before the lockup would
>> trigger.  I never observed a complete successful compilation on kernel 
>> 6.10.
>> 
>> The furthest back I was able to confirm that the lockup is observed was
>> v6.10-rc3.  The furthest forward I was able to confirm is good was v6.9.9 
>> in
>> the stable tree.  Unfortunately, between those two tags there seems to be a
>> wide range of commits where the CIFS functionality is completely broken, 
>> and
>> reads/writes return total nonsense results.  For example, any git commands
>> return "git error: bad signature 0x00000000".  So I cannot execute a
>> compilation on commits in this range in order to test whether they observe
>> the lockup issue.  Therefore I wasn't able to test most of the range, and
>> wasn't able to complete a traditional bisect.  I tried adjusting the
>> read/write buffers down to 8192 from the defaults, but this did not help.  
>> I
>> also tried toggling several options that might be related, namely
>> CONFIG_FSCACHE, to no effect.  There are no logs emitted to dmesg when the
>> lockup occurs.
>> 
>> Thanks - please let me know if there is any further information I can
>> provide.  For now I am rolling all hosts back to kernel 6.9.
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve

Hi Steve, just tested.  Not only is it still there in 6.11-rc3, but it's much 
worse - I got an immediate lockup just from ./configure

Thank you for looking at this.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-15 21:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-15 17:53 CIFS lockup regression on SMB1 in 6.10 matoro
2024-08-15 19:37 ` Steve French
2024-08-15 21:22   ` matoro [this message]
2024-08-16  3:31     ` Steve French
2024-08-16  3:47       ` matoro
2024-08-20 19:33       ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)
     [not found]         ` <CAH2r5mugVqy=jd_9x1xKYym6id1F2O-QuSX8C0HKbZPHybgCDQ@mail.gmail.com>
2024-08-23 20:51           ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)
2024-09-03  4:55             ` matoro
     [not found]               ` <CAH2r5mtDbD2uNdodE5WsOmzSoswn67eHAqGVjZJPHbX1ipkhSw@mail.gmail.com>
2024-09-05 14:40                 ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)
     [not found]               ` <2322699.1725442054@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
     [not found]                 ` <c8027078-bd61-449e-8199-908af20b1f10@moonlit-rail.com>
2024-09-05 15:40                   ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)
2024-09-14 22:15                     ` matoro
2024-09-15  0:51                       ` Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)
     [not found]                         ` <CAH2r5mtEdn5tWBn3cs6chxxRdWNT1VFjYwYcsWU7sZkAqsW8rw@mail.gmail.com>
2024-09-15  0:57                           ` Fwd: " Steve French

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bf5a6d9797f33d256b9fffeb79014242@matoro.tk \
    --to=matoro_mailinglist_kernel@matoro.tk \
    --cc=bruno@clisp.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox