From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02DADC47088 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 21:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F89613C5 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 21:51:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233993AbhEZVwl (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2021 17:52:41 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49150 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233790AbhEZVwl (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2021 17:52:41 -0400 Received: from hr2.samba.org (hr2.samba.org [IPv6:2a01:4f8:192:486::2:0]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A009C061574 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 14:51:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=samba.org; s=42; h=Message-ID:Date:To:From:CC; bh=r6gzmxIk8xHik7G+/zX+m60A6R9a0kyIJ20NK3gcjk8=; b=jXq+EMRMLZMwzz2wtnphwiyoBI Gau+F/QgtBJC8D2DlJwiSEYnC6jVV0ywsfggXjs9Fp+D0oOu3NtQr8/9HlBI4ehAKf8JbaBj182vo IkWMNSRF3kd9NdiH4Ns+kWElxXYzfWrXmaHY6ZEIljWYoOZlPpIanqGuOohAbLMBLcKAMC0w7wnuz azZhRXRXhMNRc3BaUmjz5T5tnE+mUaiLqHbYIGsRuNwuzCbfx4DP58kat8jERpVS4rws1TV5lu+qI Itscpj4hABiznUQoQAbVtzgAIB3lAG3cFTw7gORkgpeU4L0+FP9ZvOiYa1I8peZ/tuU7p3xWmppBt htChBwkxA9cTaxb4mzsptPdQ4qrsG3mGup3mHVwZ2KEgWKywKAcV9CnXnu/l6hLVQ8v/uXJAL0l5m RayKTVQlOns/51gQrBp0+Q0a56+OVG2j4ZChLWpi/gfkO+s9pj5rBlvdqJTJ50Nrd+V88sUsI2EzZ bvprHkXnHFoV6SzO2BAQLjey; Received: from [2a01:4f8:192:486::6:0] (port=56372 helo=hr6.samba.org) by hr2.samba.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim) id 1lm1Qg-0004EO-HL for cifs-qa@samba.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 21:51:06 +0000 Received: from [::1] (port=34254 helo=bugzilla.samba.org) by hr6.samba.org with esmtp (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1lm1Qf-008pHF-Oo for cifs-qa@samba.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 21:51:05 +0000 From: samba-bugs@samba.org To: cifs-qa@samba.org Subject: [Bug 14713] SMBv3 negotiation fails with a Solaris server Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 21:51:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: QAcontact X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: CifsVFS X-Bugzilla-Component: kernel fs X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.x X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: sfrench@samba.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: sfrench@samba.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.samba.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14713 --- Comment #30 from Steve French --- Presumably Solaris server doesn't like the signature (which is odd). Let's compare with SMB3.0 as well if possible. Was the SMB2.1 mounts (which succeeded) signed? That is weird if signed works with 2.1 and fails with 3= .0 and 3.1.1 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.=