From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-179.mta1.migadu.com (out-179.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE2322D8DC3 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2026 08:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.179 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769933689; cv=none; b=M05iNLnaxWFzgyAWYN8u1ijKSJIR9Uuu+gfarErvTwzycwho7cIM3gq0TZB10XCGy3qGzYcObNMBfhKzjMgiUJW4CZOQ411AYlG1gfrC3i/Hm1C5zjj6ZI2kcF7QxsMGlvf/Gpxwv496+LSYv5lKCwk8+sRXZdb5C4aJo9+PR34= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769933689; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1VMg1QZKau42hn0oeZvoSDlNt4C8BC0vouvwHVuPMAk=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=fLNZAAyjFpqUrPcHnEdj3x5bjAbm2cbuhD23rOMtfvx6GQoIXO4hpkg8DqjgkClJHHErW1IcH/NBR5huClLJUYeGMdK52klvhcv8gD58p93qLI7WiT69ge06zSN0xorZS/2BTMCQMSwWq6iRTagWvSL0zU6A4mCRsVMWwyOFIT8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=CMgDd2uu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.179 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="CMgDd2uu" Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1769933684; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=u0IH4iV2XH1mj1VuxjvgwPVWsRggOPvkZHdzBXTda4I=; b=CMgDd2uuHruAvJQ4GeHwiYZ2G49XMuLLgEjNHuyYpO55fBeqaUeuGUTqxxRKb76b6x3rEe /p8GlX2z61UE7LDYwxHQGNjhu1mnl89TwAiKGC7HdYBncbpd8+b3FXF+0S/lm+baO5c2FO palE8UT8WbxjeJEHaSnrCE0aVNjA5bc= Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2026 16:14:27 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfstests failed test cases To: Steve French , Shyam Prasad N , David Howells , Henrique Carvalho , Bharath S M , Meetakshi Setiya , ChenXiaoSong , Paulo Alcantara , Steve French , Enzo Matsumiya Cc: CIFS References: <9751f02d-d1df-4265-a7d6-b19761b21834@linux.dev> Content-Language: en-US X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: ChenXiaoSong In-Reply-To: <9751f02d-d1df-4265-a7d6-b19761b21834@linux.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT I have already submitted a patch to fix this issue: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cifs/20260201081017.998628-1-chenxiaosong.chenxiaosong@linux.dev/ Thanks, ChenXiaoSong On 2/1/26 2:30 PM, ChenXiaoSong wrote: > Steve and I have completed a git bisect and found the first bad commit: > [e255612b5ed9f179abe8196df7c2ba09dd227900] cifs: Add fallback for SMB2 > CREATE without FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES > > For detailed information, please check the link: https:// > chenxiaosong.com/en/smb-buildbot.html#cifs-103-bisect > > Thanks, > ChenXiaoSong > > On 1/29/26 8:20 PM, ChenXiaoSong wrote: >> I found the key factor that triggers kmemleak in cifs/103, the >> directory exported by the server must be read-only. >> >> When sharing a folder on Windows, do not check "Allow Change", set the >> permissions of the shared directory to read-only. >> >> Alternatively, `smb.conf` of Samba is configured as follows: >> ``` >> [test] >>      ... >>      read only = yes >> [test2] >>      ... >>      read only = yes >> ``` >> >> For detailed information, please check the link: https:// >> chenxiaosong.com/en/smb-buildbot.html#cifs-103 >> >> I will first try to analyze the code, and if that doesn't work, I will >> try to bisect it. >> >> Thanks, >> ChenXiaoSong >> >> On 1/28/26 23:29, ChenXiaoSong wrote: >>> I have reproduced the failures of these test cases. For detailed >>> information, please check the link: https://chenxiaosong.com/en/smb- >>> buildbot.html (I will ensure this link is always accessible). >>> >>> Perhaps sending these issues to the mailing list could help resolve >>> them more quickly. >