From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fabamailgate01.fabasoft.com (fabamailgate01.fabasoft.com [192.84.221.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 476E22066CB for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2025 22:22:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.84.221.202 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737843775; cv=none; b=YGShlFR/KULJCIZJBtmixqeRP+EHiusERbmedauHsnI2iwKxpFtfbNPA6LHfcLkWcuIQhSlAV4fXr8j8d9ApBi4DsjBbYnkgayXjpkRYAPpx1VWUUXKUZATXhjqnVAnA3v4vLED7sXdCXxuIOyJ9UI+VEc7nSqetJLDU3GBpsTI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737843775; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SPcyrQtXln2T2uDvxn+Ph/exivwbXMt9N+aWFHgcsjY=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=LmxbBnYmoi1DP/pzvrEIphcFoTIsP8ODbA8hvvqBaRucbmsK7Hi9fnhFv9Fy6zIcjkFMuDFkR5cOGrmWXz8P7Kv6UxR7XVx9wUVPEFjsKfwKD8kGwKs4l7/nJnbIS4NdCuxLd3M4+LaSp8mSOCj7R8D3XkdQ8WlBC0WkRBdpSSA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=fabasoft.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fabasoft.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.84.221.202 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=fabasoft.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fabasoft.com Received: from fabamailgate01.fabasoft.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fabamailgate01.fabasoft.com (Fabasoft e-Mail Services) with ESMTPS id 5277D2004130; Sat, 25 Jan 2025 23:22:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=fabamailgate01.fabasoft.com) by fabamailgate01.fabasoft.com with ESMTP (eXpurgate 4.51.0) (envelope-from ) id 67956434-045f-7f0000012b03-7f000001d8ee-1 for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2025 23:22:44 +0100 Received: from FABAEXCH01.fabagl.fabasoft.com (fabaexch01 [10.10.5.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fabamailgate01.fabasoft.com (Fabasoft e-Mail Services) with ESMTPS; Sat, 25 Jan 2025 23:22:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from FABAEXCH01.fabagl.fabasoft.com (10.10.5.4) by FABAEXCH01.fabagl.fabasoft.com (10.10.5.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.44; Sat, 25 Jan 2025 23:22:43 +0100 Received: from FABAEXCH01.fabagl.fabasoft.com ([fe80::c9d7:6a74:cdb8:4ed7]) by FABAEXCH01.fabagl.fabasoft.com ([fe80::c9d7:6a74:cdb8:4ed7%4]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.044; Sat, 25 Jan 2025 23:22:43 +0100 From: "Reiterer, Horst" To: "pc@manguebit.com" CC: "linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org" Subject: RE: Regression: smb: chmod ignored (5.14.0-427.40.1.el9_4 vs. 5.14.0-503.15.1.el9_5) Thread-Topic: Regression: smb: chmod ignored (5.14.0-427.40.1.el9_4 vs. 5.14.0-503.15.1.el9_5) Thread-Index: Adtvd23lVSVT8VVlSIaajlplMuoqUw== Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2025 22:22:43 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US, de-AT Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-purgate-ID: 152191::1737843764-D67BAACB-75584E38/0/0 X-purgate-type: clean X-purgate-size: 1136 X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de X-purgate: clean X-purgate: This mail is considered clean Hi Paulo, thanks for testing with mainline. Bug created: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219724 Cheers, Horst Reiterer -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: Paulo Alcantara =20 Gesendet: Samstag, 25. Januar 2025 15:25 An: Reiterer, Horst ; linux-cifs@vger.kernel.o= rg Betreff: Re: Regression: smb: chmod ignored (5.14.0-427.40.1.el9_4 vs. 5.14= .0-503.15.1.el9_5) Hi, Thanks for the report. "Reiterer, Horst" writes: > after updating from AlmaLinux 9.4 to 9.5=20 > (https://repo.almalinux.org/vault/9.4/BaseOS/Source/Packages/kernel-5. > 14.0-427.40.1.el9_4.src.rpm vs.=20 > https://repo.almalinux.org/vault/9.5/BaseOS/Source/Packages/kernel-5.1 > 4.0-503.15.1.el9_5.src.rpm), chmod gets ignored by the CIFS filesystem=20 > when executed against a Windows file server unless chmod happens in=20 > another process. Yeah, I was able to reproduce it with mainline kernel as well. Could you please file a bug [1] against File System -> CIFS component? Thanks. [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/