From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-173.mta0.migadu.com (out-173.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9359221FAC for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2026 06:57:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770015432; cv=none; b=TTlBQF7aS/GY5ho4N1J8j+L6WwQ+ucnXMcmqC0cO92BPPSaCtXWrdq7FnRmY80bfSKxAZqo3LxszSxSosoJPZrvnkBWSiwye6zzpMEHPxW4M+SCMqxZbq8uUgevRQVOplX9YGNjw7bQLkMrjRo9bHnA7STsOgtjQKSRNGGoZPR4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770015432; c=relaxed/simple; bh=66PW05pBhmyYmyIa17BwxXAe/I387R2NwopiX7V15+k=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=JK/R7SV+/TbIUplBX4SknZ7aj/j8NshOLk1rSMzbI0gxMEdUiEHf8UzyW2ZgS1EUvUBU8N9icrlCSQmGeixZrRMLy14m0z7cKN/9n/wzAj3qJXxYQxoQAW/Yw5rKr+XPQ8x2lkVLS2w/92YHz+lM36XsOkKAXE06CJAVZeemxvg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=kpiNKo4s; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="kpiNKo4s" Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1770015427; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Od7qjQ5czU1GIbiVuvSvwzVniaqBkFojrd7As4edaMU=; b=kpiNKo4sM1peiqFzfTjPM9qCh3a8Vgclw/cAuocgg1j+Kr/sz4h0jVoCuer/iUkoN77iJ5 wv4VbLtXiPKRnZl/BH0POFO9wxgciW5bSC1yU+4jgRXpvChTV1gulIGcu+YcB4+zNccFM8 rPKaDJPkRmL/8Frw+345p8dnC5TJSmk= Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 14:56:56 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfstests failed test cases To: Steve French , Shyam Prasad N , David Howells , Henrique Carvalho , Bharath S M , Meetakshi Setiya , ChenXiaoSong , Paulo Alcantara , Steve French , Enzo Matsumiya , =?UTF-8?Q?Pali_Roh=C3=A1r?= , linkinjeon@kernel.org, ChenXiaoSong Cc: CIFS References: <9751f02d-d1df-4265-a7d6-b19761b21834@linux.dev> Content-Language: en-US X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: ChenXiaoSong In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT I have submitted another patch to fix the SMB1 kmemleak issue: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cifs/20260202064928.1879323-1-chenxiaosong.chenxiaosong@linux.dev/ Thanks, ChenXiaoSong On 2/1/26 4:14 PM, ChenXiaoSong wrote: > I have already submitted a patch to fix this issue: https:// > lore.kernel.org/linux-cifs/20260201081017.998628-1- > chenxiaosong.chenxiaosong@linux.dev/ > > Thanks, > ChenXiaoSong > > On 2/1/26 2:30 PM, ChenXiaoSong wrote: >> Steve and I have completed a git bisect and found the first bad commit: >> [e255612b5ed9f179abe8196df7c2ba09dd227900] cifs: Add fallback for SMB2 >> CREATE without FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES >> >> For detailed information, please check the link: https:// >> chenxiaosong.com/en/smb-buildbot.html#cifs-103-bisect >> >> Thanks, >> ChenXiaoSong >> >> On 1/29/26 8:20 PM, ChenXiaoSong wrote: >>> I found the key factor that triggers kmemleak in cifs/103, the >>> directory exported by the server must be read-only. >>> >>> When sharing a folder on Windows, do not check "Allow Change", set >>> the permissions of the shared directory to read-only. >>> >>> Alternatively, `smb.conf` of Samba is configured as follows: >>> ``` >>> [test] >>>      ... >>>      read only = yes >>> [test2] >>>      ... >>>      read only = yes >>> ``` >>> >>> For detailed information, please check the link: https:// >>> chenxiaosong.com/en/smb-buildbot.html#cifs-103 >>> >>> I will first try to analyze the code, and if that doesn't work, I >>> will try to bisect it. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> ChenXiaoSong >>> >>> On 1/28/26 23:29, ChenXiaoSong wrote: >>>> I have reproduced the failures of these test cases. For detailed >>>> information, please check the link: https://chenxiaosong.com/en/smb- >>>> buildbot.html (I will ensure this link is always accessible). >>>> >>>> Perhaps sending these issues to the mailing list could help resolve >>>> them more quickly. >> >