From: "Aurélien Aptel" <aaptel-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
To: Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-cifs <linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix regression which breaks DFS mounting
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 20:29:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mps1t0wswyh.fsf@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473164554-8062-1-git-send-email-sprabhu-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1443 bytes --]
This is not enough to fix DFS. I believe we also need [1] to handle DFS
links to subdirs.
I have SERVER_A with a DFS link to //SERVER_B/sub/dir.
cifs_are_all_path_accessible() and cifs_get_root() walk along the path
components and do queries on them. But they are not skipping the initial
host + share name on the UNC resulting in failed queries:
CLIENT_A_____ -> SERVER_B____ SMB Trans2 Request,
QUERY_PATH_INFO, Query File All Info, Path: //SERVER_B____
SERVER_B____ -> CLIENT_A_____ SMB Trans2 Response,
QUERY_PATH_INFO, Error: STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND
The QUERY_PATH_INFO request here is using the first path component which
is not a file path but an incomplete UNC path.
That path is made by cifs_build_path_to_root() which only makes a full
UNC path when in a DFS. It is not necessary on the servers I've tested
(cf [1]).
Therefore the fix is to not make a full UNC path in
cifs_build_path_to_root() or to add a flag to its parameters to decide
whether to prefix the host+share or not. I've sent patches for both
solution on the thread [1] (look at all the messages of the thread).
1: http://marc.info/?i=20160801143204.7377b5a4@aaptelpc
--
Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team
GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-06 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-06 12:22 [PATCH] Fix regression which breaks DFS mounting Sachin Prabhu
[not found] ` <1473164554-8062-1-git-send-email-sprabhu-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-09-06 18:29 ` Aurélien Aptel [this message]
[not found] ` <mps1t0wswyh.fsf-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
2016-09-07 9:02 ` Sachin Prabhu
[not found] ` <1473238975.3882.39.camel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-09-07 16:22 ` Aurélien Aptel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mps1t0wswyh.fsf@suse.com \
--to=aaptel-ibi9rg/b67k@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sprabhu-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox