From: "Aurélien Aptel" <aaptel-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
To: Robin Blanchard
<robin.blanchard-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Steve French <smfrench-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-cifs\@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: cifs.ko + smb 3.0 + DFS fails (though direct mount succeeds)
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 11:06:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mpsmv98ti7d.fsf@aaptelpc.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJUwKM25Kd-BHgPNXHkTtvYvK1Ad5uaLkooG6i4H+kawDL1ACg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Hi Robin,
Robin Blanchard <robin.blanchard-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:
> Thanks, Steve.
>
> Given WannaCry (and its derivatives), many shops are disabling SMBv1
> entirely (not necessarily a bad idea). Any idea as to when the
> aforementioned fixes might be pushed downstream? I've tested Ubuntu
> 17.04 with the same results (DFS fails with SMB > v1).
>
> Status code returned 0xc0000016 STATUS_MORE_PROCESSING_REQUIRED
> Status code returned 0xc0000257 STATUS_PATH_NOT_COVERED
> CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -38
>
> # uname -r
> 4.10.0-22-generic
Unless canonical has backported my changes you need at least linux 4.11.
Cheers,
--
Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team
GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-16 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-20 20:09 cifs.ko + smb 3.0 + DFS fails (though direct mount succeeds) Robin Blanchard
[not found] ` <CAJUwKM3-U2yRHB5O-R19wmzj1-yrO3sU_b8+xVCFaFwsZRWtTA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-20 20:14 ` Steve French
[not found] ` <CAH2r5mvn_Z5B=kYza1gAr3SkPX+kwKmXBEXcTBL327zcW8FP-g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-14 18:18 ` Robin Blanchard
[not found] ` <CAJUwKM25Kd-BHgPNXHkTtvYvK1Ad5uaLkooG6i4H+kawDL1ACg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-16 9:06 ` Aurélien Aptel [this message]
[not found] ` <mpsmv98ti7d.fsf-zpEvHKhluMwYitT5tn2FcQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-16 15:42 ` Christian Garling
[not found] ` <CDE2E2CE-EE67-44AE-A0C8-D3AFF6EAAA01-JDaHaePr6SMW6PBduJaimg@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-19 10:59 ` Aurélien Aptel
[not found] ` <58abb375-f7fb-58ec-4786-9ebd202fffa3@cg-networks.de>
[not found] ` <58abb375-f7fb-58ec-4786-9ebd202fffa3-JDaHaePr6SMW6PBduJaimg@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-20 12:02 ` Aurélien Aptel
2017-06-20 14:14 ` Robin Blanchard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mpsmv98ti7d.fsf@aaptelpc.suse.de \
--to=aaptel-ibi9rg/b67k@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robin.blanchard-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=smfrench-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox