From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: qcom: restrict drivers per ARM/ARM64
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 13:45:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0cee46b0-445c-6e9f-3bc3-50a107cbaf4a@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9cbbb9c3-f645-0066-a505-35cc7ae087bc@linaro.org>
On 23/01/2023 13:31, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
>
> On 23.01.2023 10:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> There is no point to allow selecting pin-controller drivers for Qualcomm
>> ARMv7 SoCs when building ARM64 kernel, and vice versa. This makes
>> kernel configuration more difficult as many do not remember the Qualcomm
>> SoCs model names/numbers. There won't be a single image for ARMv7 and
>> ARMv8/9 SoCs, so no features/options are lost.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>> ---
> Not sure about the newest of the newest SoCs with Cortex-X etc,
> but older ones, particularly including 8916 (as some vendors
> in their infinite wisdom decided that shipping a 32 bit tz is
> a good idea) having ARM || ARM64 would make sense.
Why? ARM || ARM64 is implied by ARCH_QCOM, so what would it give?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-23 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-23 9:49 [PATCH 1/2] clk: qcom: add compile test to MSM8996 CPU clocks Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-01-23 9:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] clk: qcom: restrict drivers per ARM/ARM64 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-01-23 12:31 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-01-23 12:45 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2023-01-23 12:47 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-01-25 20:44 ` Stephen Boyd
2023-01-26 9:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-01-30 23:30 ` Stephen Boyd
2023-02-01 7:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-02-10 22:32 ` Stephen Boyd
2023-02-11 11:19 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-01-23 12:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] clk: qcom: add compile test to MSM8996 CPU clocks Konrad Dybcio
2023-01-23 20:22 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0cee46b0-445c-6e9f-3bc3-50a107cbaf4a@linaro.org \
--to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox