From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Anup Patel <anup.patel@broadcom.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
Jon Mason <jonmason@broadcom.com>,
Oza Pawandeep <oza.oza@broadcom.com>,
Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@broadcom.com>,
Pramod Kumar <pramod.kumar@broadcom.com>,
Sandeep Tripathy <sandeep.tripathy@broadcom.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] Broadcom Stingray SOC Initial Support
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 17:28:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0e321ac9-37ce-6c52-e76a-250183ca299c@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170606223027.GL20170@codeaurora.org>
On 06/06/2017 03:30 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 06/05, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/05/2017 09:51 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 06/01/2017 11:34 PM, Anup Patel wrote:
>>>> This patchset adds initial support of Broadcom Stingray SOC
>>>> by reusing existing Broadcom iProc device drivers.
>>>>
>>>> Most of the patches in this patchset are DT patches except
>>>> the Stingray clock tree support which just one patch.
>>>>
>>>> This patchset is based on Linux-4.12-rc3 and it is also available
>>>> at stingray-v6 branch of https://github.com/Broadcom/arm64-linux.git
>>>>
>>>> Changes since v5:
>>>> - Rebased patches for Linux-4.12-rc3
>>>> - Update DT node names to match register offset
>>>>
>>>> Changes since v4:
>>>> - Reduce number of include headers in Stingray clk driver
>>>>
>>>> Changes since v3:
>>>> - Rebased patches for Linux-4.12-rc1
>>>> - Updated PATCH3 to have all clocks except genpll3 to be
>>>> registered via platform driver probe
>>>>
>>>> Changes since v2:
>>>> - Remove default bootargs from chosen DT node
>>>> - Remove "linux" prefix from stdout DT attribute of chosen DT node
>>>> - Remove use of GIC_CPU_MASK_xxx() for PPIs
>>>>
>>>> Changes since v1:
>>>> - Rebased patches for Linux-4.12-rc1
>>>> - Removed unwanted /memreserve/ from bcm958742-base.dtsi
>>>> - Use ranges DT property to clear view of memory-layout
>>>> - Make bcm-sr.h part of clock DT bindings patch
>>>>
>>>> Anup Patel (3):
>>>> dt-bindings: bcm: Add Broadcom Stingray bindings document
>>>> arm64: dts: Initial DTS files for Broadcom Stingray SOC
>>>> arm64: dts: Add PL022, PL330 and SP805 DT nodes for Stingray
>>>>
>>>> Oza Pawandeep (1):
>>>> arm64: dts: Add I2C DT nodes for Stingray SoC
>>>>
>>>> Pramod Kumar (3):
>>>> arm64: dts: Add NAND DT nodes for Stingray SOC
>>>> arm64: dts: Add pinctrl DT nodes for Stingray SOC
>>>> arm64: dts: Add GPIO DT nodes for Stingray SOC
>>>>
>>>> Sandeep Tripathy (3):
>>>> dt-bindings: clk: Extend binding doc for Stingray SOC
>>>> clk: bcm: Add clocks for Stingray SOC
>>>> arm64: dts: Add clock DT nodes for Stingray SOC
>>>>
>>>> Srinath Mannam (1):
>>>> arm64: dts: Add PWM and SDHCI DT nodes for Stingray SOC
>>>
>>> Applied patches 1, 4-11 to devicetree-arm64/next, thanks!
>>
>> Also took patch 2, to make sure everything builds properly, Stephen, let
>> me know if you want me to take patch #3 as well.
>>
>
> Usually clk tree takes includes and hosts that in a stable branch
> for arm-soc maintainers to take. It seems that now arm-soc
> maintainers are asking that dts files use plain numbers and then
> switch to defines later after -rc1.
>
> Should I go apply patch 2 myself so I can apply patch 3 to the
> clk tree? Personally, I think this is fine because git doesn't
> care about duplicate commits anyway and this is just #defines
> we're talking about. Alternatively, you can host patch 2 in a
> stable branch on v4.12-rc1 that I can pull into clk tree and then
> apply patch 3 on top of and merge up into clk-next. Or you can
> send me a PR for this clk driver and I can merge it into clk-next
> where patch 2 is the parent of the clk driver change.
Yes, please apply patch 2 and 3 in your tree, we should be fine. You
would also find patch 2 in a stable branch:
https://github.com/Broadcom/stblinux/refs/heads/arm64-stingray-for-4.13
Thanks!
--
Florian
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-20 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-02 6:34 [PATCH v6 00/11] Broadcom Stingray SOC Initial Support Anup Patel
2017-06-02 6:34 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] dt-bindings: bcm: Add Broadcom Stingray bindings document Anup Patel
2017-06-02 6:34 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] dt-bindings: clk: Extend binding doc for Stingray SOC Anup Patel
2017-06-02 6:34 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] clk: bcm: Add clocks " Anup Patel
2017-06-02 22:10 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-06 4:21 ` Anup Patel
2017-06-02 6:34 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] arm64: dts: Initial DTS files for Broadcom " Anup Patel
2017-06-02 6:34 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] arm64: dts: Add clock DT nodes for " Anup Patel
2017-06-02 6:34 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] arm64: dts: Add NAND " Anup Patel
2017-06-02 6:34 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] arm64: dts: Add pinctrl " Anup Patel
2017-06-02 6:34 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] arm64: dts: Add GPIO " Anup Patel
2017-06-02 6:34 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] arm64: dts: Add I2C DT nodes for Stingray SoC Anup Patel
2017-06-02 6:34 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] arm64: dts: Add PL022, PL330 and SP805 DT nodes for Stingray Anup Patel
2017-06-02 6:34 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] arm64: dts: Add PWM and SDHCI DT nodes for Stingray SOC Anup Patel
2017-06-05 16:51 ` [PATCH v6 00/11] Broadcom Stingray SOC Initial Support Florian Fainelli
2017-06-06 2:08 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-06-06 3:20 ` Anup Patel
2017-06-06 22:30 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-06-20 0:28 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0e321ac9-37ce-6c52-e76a-250183ca299c@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=anup.patel@broadcom.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jonmason@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=oza.oza@broadcom.com \
--cc=pramod.kumar@broadcom.com \
--cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sandeep.tripathy@broadcom.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
--cc=srinath.mannam@broadcom.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).