From: "Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@ti.com>
To: "Thomas Richard (TI.com)" <thomas.richard@bootlin.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
<richard.genoud@bootlin.com>, Prasanth Mantena <p-mantena@ti.com>,
"Abhash Kumar" <a-kumar2@ti.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
<u-kumar1@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 3/4] clk: keystone: sci-clk: add restore_context() operation
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 13:20:24 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1283df52-ee41-477f-8d91-5c4a02385cef@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251127-ti-sci-jacinto-s2r-restore-irq-v2-3-a487fa3ff221@bootlin.com>
On 11/27/2025 2:08 PM, Thomas Richard (TI.com) wrote:
> Implement the restore_context() operation to restore the clock parent
> state. The parent index is saved in sci_clk struct during set_parent().
> During clock registration, the core retrieves each clock’s parent using
> get_parent() operation to ensure the internal clock tree reflects the
> actual hardware state, including any configurations made by the
> bootloader. So we also save the parent index in get_parent().
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richard (TI.com) <thomas.richard@bootlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/keystone/sci-clk.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/keystone/sci-clk.c b/drivers/clk/keystone/sci-clk.c
> index a4b42811de55d..1e5dd01484d1c 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/keystone/sci-clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/keystone/sci-clk.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct sci_clk_provider {
> * @node: Link for handling clocks probed via DT
> * @cached_req: Cached requested freq for determine rate calls
> * @cached_res: Cached result freq for determine rate calls
> + * @parent_id: Parent index for this clock
> */
> struct sci_clk {
> struct clk_hw hw;
> @@ -58,6 +59,7 @@ struct sci_clk {
> struct list_head node;
> unsigned long cached_req;
> unsigned long cached_res;
> + u8 parent_id;
you may need to restore rate as well
> };
>
> #define to_sci_clk(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct sci_clk, hw)
> @@ -237,9 +239,9 @@ static u8 sci_clk_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
> return 0;
> }
>
> - parent_id = parent_id - clk->clk_id - 1;
> + clk->parent_id = (u8)(parent_id - clk->clk_id - 1);
>
> - return (u8)parent_id;
> + return clk->parent_id;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -252,12 +254,24 @@ static u8 sci_clk_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
> static int sci_clk_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
> {
> struct sci_clk *clk = to_sci_clk(hw);
> + int ret;
>
> clk->cached_req = 0;
>
> - return clk->provider->ops->set_parent(clk->provider->sci, clk->dev_id,
> - clk->clk_id,
> - index + 1 + clk->clk_id);
> + ret = clk->provider->ops->set_parent(clk->provider->sci, clk->dev_id,
> + clk->clk_id,
> + index + 1 + clk->clk_id);
> + if (!ret)
> + clk->parent_id = index;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void sci_clk_restore_context(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct sci_clk *clk = to_sci_clk(hw);
> +
> + sci_clk_set_parent(hw, clk->parent_id);
You should restore, if this is BOARD_CFG managed
> }
>
> static const struct clk_ops sci_clk_ops = {
> @@ -269,6 +283,7 @@ static const struct clk_ops sci_clk_ops = {
> .set_rate = sci_clk_set_rate,
> .get_parent = sci_clk_get_parent,
> .set_parent = sci_clk_set_parent,
> + .restore_context = sci_clk_restore_context,
> };
>
> /**
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-03 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-27 8:38 [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] firmware: ti_sci: Introduce BOARDCFG_MANAGED mode for Jacinto family Thomas Richard (TI.com)
2025-11-27 8:38 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/4] firmware: ti_sci: add BOARDCFG_MANAGED mode support Thomas Richard (TI.com)
2025-11-27 8:38 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/4] firmware: ti_sci: handle IRQ restore in BOARDCFG_MANAGED mode during resume Thomas Richard (TI.com)
2025-11-27 8:38 ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/4] clk: keystone: sci-clk: add restore_context() operation Thomas Richard (TI.com)
2025-12-03 7:50 ` Kumar, Udit [this message]
2025-12-03 14:10 ` Thomas Richard
2025-11-27 8:38 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/4] firmware: ti_sci: restore clock context during resume in BOARDCFG_MANAGED mode Thomas Richard (TI.com)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1283df52-ee41-477f-8d91-5c4a02385cef@ti.com \
--to=u-kumar1@ti.com \
--cc=a-kumar2@ti.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=kristo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=p-mantena@ti.com \
--cc=richard.genoud@bootlin.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=thomas.richard@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox