From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Peng Fan <van.freenix@gmail.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
<linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC/WIP] xen: clk: introudce pvclk for device passthrough
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 12:41:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1453120919.6020.142.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <569CCB58.5040904@citrix.com>
On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 11:24 +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 16/01/16 05:22, Peng Fan wrote:
> > This patch was just a initial patch, not sure whether this way
> > is ok from you side for handlding clk when doing platform device
> > passhthrough. Any comments are appreciated, and your comments may
> > give me a better direction.
>=20
> There's no documentation on the interface, which makes it difficult to
> review.=C2=A0=C2=A0At a first look it looks very specific to the particul=
ar Linux
> implementation of a clk subsystem.
>=20
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/xen/interface/io/clkif.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
> > +/*
> > + * The code contained herein is licensed under the GNU General Public
> > + * License. You may obtain a copy of the GNU General Public License
> > + * Version 2 or later at the following locations:
> > + *
> > + * http://www.opensource.org/licenses/gpl-license.html
> > + * http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
> > + */
>=20
> ABIs should be under a more permissive license so they can be used by
> other (non-GPLv2) operating systems.
... along the same lines proposals for new ABIs should be made in the form
of patches to xen.git:xen/include/public/io/ before being submitted as an
implementation for one particular os.
> > + unsigned long rate;
> > + char clk_name[32];
>=20
> Where does the frontend get these names from?=C2=A0=C2=A031 character nam=
es seems
> rather limiting.
Indeed.
At a guess I would assume they come from the device-tree given to the guest
and tie into the host device tree.
I think a better model might be for each clk to have it's own subdirectory
under the overall clock bus node, e.g. something like:
/local/domain/<...>/clk/0/nr-clks =3D 4
/local/domain/<...>/clk/0/clk-0/ ...
/local/domain/<...>/clk/0/clk-1/ ...
/lo
cal/domain/<...>/clk/0/clk-2/ ...
/local/domain/<...>/clk/0/clk-3/ ...
and for each subdirectory to contain the a node containing the correspondin=
g firmware table identifier (so path in the DT case), which the toolstack k=
nows, so it can setup the f/e and b/e to correspond as necessary, and the f=
/e device needn't necessarily use the same name as the backend/host).
The request would then include the index and not the name (and as David obs=
erves the response only needs the id).
As well as properly documenting the meaning of the operations=C2=A0
the clkif.h should also define the xenstore nodes and contain the binary la=
youts of the req/rsp structs (see netif.h for examples of both, blkif.h als=
o includes examples of the former).
I'd also like to see a description of the DT bindings, which I assume must =
be needed such that the devices clocks property has something to refer to. =
For example maybe it doesn't make sense for xenstore to contain the path, b=
ut for the pvclk node in xenstore to contain the index.
> > +
> > +DEFINE_RING_TYPES(xen_clkif, struct xen_clkif_request, struct
> > xen_clkif_response);
> > +#define XEN_CLK_RING_SIZE __CONST_RING_SIZE(xen_clkif, PAGE_SIZE)
> > +
> > +#endif
> >=20
>=20
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-18 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-16 5:22 [RFC/WIP] xen: clk: introudce pvclk for device passthrough Peng Fan
2016-01-18 11:22 ` [Xen-devel] " George Dunlap
2016-01-19 1:18 ` Peng Fan
2016-01-18 11:24 ` David Vrabel
2016-01-18 12:41 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2016-01-19 2:43 ` Peng Fan
2016-01-19 10:06 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-19 1:33 ` Peng Fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1453120919.6020.142.camel@citrix.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=julien.grall@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=van.freenix@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox