From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: lpc32xx: allow peripheral clock selection in device tree From: Sylvain Lemieux To: sboyd@codeaurora.org Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy , mturquette@baylibre.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1466512531.2114.6.camel@localhost> References: <1464982475-24738-1-git-send-email-slemieux.tyco@gmail.com> <1466512531.2114.6.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 09:43:35 -0400 Message-ID: <1467639815.9582.3.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-ID: Hi Stephan, On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 08:35 -0400, Sylvain Lemieux wrote: > Hi Vladimir, > > On Tue, 2016-06-21 at 07:28 +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: > > Hi Sylvain, > > > > On 03.06.2016 22:34, Sylvain Lemieux wrote: > > > From: Sylvain Lemieux > > > > > > This patch add the support to select the peripheral clock (PERIPH) > > > as a parent clock source using the "assigned-clock-parents" > > > parameter in the device tree. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sylvain Lemieux > > > > Acked-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy > > > > The change looks good, is it done to support a selection of PWM parent clocks? > > Yes, this is the case. > > > > I think it makes sense to set PERIPH clock as a default parent for both > > PWM controllers, please consider to send a DTS change. > > I will do. > > Thanks for the feedback, > Sylvain > do you think you can take this change for 4.8? Regards, Sylvain