Re: [PATCH v9 01/10] clk: fix initial state of critical clock's parents

Stephen Boyd
2016-08-13T00:39:13Z

On 08/12, James Liao wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-10 at 14:09 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > (Including lists)
> >
> > On 08/09, James Liao wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 13:46 +0800, James Liao wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Mike,
> > >>
> > >> Do you have new patches to fix new clock parents? If not, I think we can
> > >> use my patch first. Is it okay?
> > >>
> > >
> > > Hi Stephen,
> > >
> > > Do you have comments for the bug fixing? I prefer to use my patch (clk:
> > > fix initial state of critical clock's parents). How do you think?
> > >
> >
> > How about we recalc accuracies and rates in addition to the patch
> > from Mike? That will fix everything?
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> It works!
>
> I'll send a new series of MT2701 clock support in few days. Should I
> include this patch in my series? Or you'll merge it into clk-next
> directly?
>

Thanks. I can take that as a tested-by? I can merge it into
clk-next directly, but do we need to put the mt2701 patches on a
separate branch to merge into arm-soc? If so we'll need to put
this patch first to avoid bisection failures.

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project