From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <1490313138.25996.10.camel@mtkswgap22> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] irqchip: mtk-sysirq: extend intpol base to arbitrary number From: Mars Cheng To: Marc Zyngier CC: Matthias Brugger , Rob Herring , Michael Turquette , "Stephen Boyd" , CC Hwang , Loda Chou , Miles Chen , Jades Shih , Yingjoe Chen , "My Chuang" , , , , , , Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:52:18 +0800 In-Reply-To: <3790b6ad-12c0-0c48-c24e-0f3397c6bbba@arm.com> References: <1489937193-2953-1-git-send-email-mars.cheng@mediatek.com> <1489937193-2953-3-git-send-email-mars.cheng@mediatek.com> <3790b6ad-12c0-0c48-c24e-0f3397c6bbba@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path: mars.cheng@mediatek.com List-ID: On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 16:25 +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 19/03/17 15:26, Mars Cheng wrote: > > Originally driver only supports one base. However, MT6797 has > > more than one bases to configure interrupt polarity. To support > > possible design change, here comes a solution to use arbitrary > > number of bases. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mars Cheng > > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier > > What is the merge strategy for this? I'm happy to take the irqchip stuff > through my tree, but there is much more in this series... > Hi Marc Thanks for your review. Hi Matthias Would you comment on this? If Marc take the following stuff first in his tree: [PATCH v3 01/12] dt-bindings: mediatek: multiple bases support for sysirq [PATCH v3 02/12] irqchip: mtk-sysirq: extend intpol base to arbitrary number [PATCH v3 03/12] irqchip: mtk-sysirq: prevent unnecessary visibility when set_type Since other stuff might need more review and irqchip didn't affect them. Thanks. > Thanks, > > M.