From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Boyd , "Jerome Brunet" From: Michael Turquette In-Reply-To: <20170727224459.GO2146@codeaurora.org> Cc: "Linus Walleij" , "linux-clk" , "Kevin Hilman" , "open list:ARM/Amlogic Meson..." , "Russell King" , "Boris Brezillon" , "Adriana Reus" References: <20170612194438.12298-1-jbrunet@baylibre.com> <1497955822.7387.3.camel@baylibre.com> <1497961950.7387.7.camel@baylibre.com> <1498050903.7387.12.camel@baylibre.com> <20170712011604.GQ22780@codeaurora.org> <1501088747.2401.27.camel@baylibre.com> <20170727224459.GO2146@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <150223201433.22158.14534387406241186358@resonance> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] clk: implement clock rate protection mechanism Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 15:40:14 -0700 List-ID: Quoting Stephen Boyd (2017-07-27 15:44:59) > On 07/26, Jerome Brunet wrote: > > In the following mail, I've only replied where I wanted to discuss a bi= t more. > > For everything else, please consider the comments agreed and the modifi= cations > > done as requested. > > = > = > Ok. Good that we can move forward in some way so this is not a > blocker. I've almost completed writing the qcom code to force > clks on and off so it will be resolved one way or the other soon. Stephen, are all of the existential issues are sufficiently resolved? Jerome, are you going to submit a v4? Thanks, Mike > = > -- = > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project