From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
kbuild-all@01.org, Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Move vendor's Kconfig into CCF menu section
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:31:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1505403.Puq3Qui8Zr@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160128083656.GM12841@codeaurora.org>
On Thursday 28 January 2016 00:36:56 Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 01/27, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 27 January 2016 17:56:18 James Liao wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I think you should include this change in your patch, or as a preparation.
> > > > All other samsung platforms already select COMMON_CLK through ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM,
> > > > and all SoCs that are part of ARCH_S3C24XX individually select a symbol that
> > > > selects COMMON_CLK.
> > >
> > > Oops, I didn't notice there are warnings after moving these Kconfigs
> > > into menu section.
> > >
> > > The original motivation of this patch is preventing new clk drivers
> > > include their Kconfig in a wrong place, so it's not critical. Do you
> > > think we should apply this patch (with your changes below) or drop this
> > > patch directly?
> >
> >
> > I think your patch is good, we just need to fix S3C24xx, which is doing
> > things in a strange way for historic reasons.
>
> So far we've taken the approach of not caring if they include
> their Kconfig outside the common clk menu when all the configs
> inside the Kconfig file are hidden. Of course, when they aren't
> hidden this becomes a problem, but that isn't the case unless
> something changed recently.
They are all hidden, but there is no real reason for that I think
(other than the samsung glitch).
Having them inside the menu makes it possible to add '|| COMPILE_TEST'
as a follow-up, and makes it more consistent overall.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-28 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-27 7:26 [PATCH] clk: Move vendor's Kconfig into CCF menu section James Liao
2016-01-27 9:18 ` kbuild test robot
2016-01-27 9:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-27 9:56 ` James Liao
2016-01-27 10:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-28 8:36 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-01-28 11:31 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-01-27 10:25 ` kbuild test robot
2016-01-27 14:48 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1505403.Puq3Qui8Zr@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox