From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Arnd Bergmann To: Wan Zongshun Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Russell King , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Lezcano , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, jason@lakedaemon.net, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, Wan Zongshun Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] ARM: NUC900: Add nuc970 machine support Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 18:04:35 +0200 Message-ID: <18260150.aRRy8ybKlm@wuerfel> In-Reply-To: <1468135649-19980-2-git-send-email-vw@iommu.org> References: <1468135649-19980-1-git-send-email-vw@iommu.org> <1468135649-19980-2-git-send-email-vw@iommu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sunday, July 10, 2016 3:27:21 PM CEST Wan Zongshun wrote: > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_SOC_NUC970),) > obj-y := irq.o time.o mfp.o gpio.o clock.o > obj-y += clksel.o dev.o cpu.o > +endif > # W90X900 CPU support files When mfp.o is disabled like this, I get a link error in two drivers using the exported interface: ERROR: "mfp_set_groupg" [drivers/spi/spi-nuc900.ko] undefined! ERROR: "mfp_set_groupi" [drivers/input/keyboard/w90p910_keypad.ko] undefined! Any idea for a better migration strategy? Arnd