From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com (esa.microchip.iphmx.com [68.232.154.123]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE1FD34BA4C; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 18:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=68.232.154.123 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758133445; cv=none; b=t6mZ194CHvUTnrTx9nfjEbMneFL/OL93WK73wEFdSnHFDRFqyGg2Kq3s4EeDcy38lVDg/66nZQeImSAGGh5nAWHKG/f+JaCTjFYILTIW30aM5FPXgwiBgYsCJaaaDpupNuhGbevnr+6wORos+EwrXQAqTFQ0LUZWDjdl/MaaZJE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758133445; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KQBYLBTGVcI6B/UU8+PuP9ANhqubXd++Fn247awfx+M=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=eC0r4D/TU7j7qTyzx7MMiVDHBqA4LEbTWw6WzWZ3jrnqWWkPBZs6SFS3vVGcw6wpLtJTYpvKcN6QvmwGBXrvTKbc/IAC11NN9Vw5tc61dfR84jzvuyf0bbCxcPKu5fXo9sKXOSUOUgRhaJTTrGCCd8eW99nd7WkvpPHoTzb1CHw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=microchip.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=microchip.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=microchip.com header.i=@microchip.com header.b=tZiROv/G; arc=none smtp.client-ip=68.232.154.123 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=microchip.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=microchip.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=microchip.com header.i=@microchip.com header.b="tZiROv/G" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1758133443; x=1789669443; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KQBYLBTGVcI6B/UU8+PuP9ANhqubXd++Fn247awfx+M=; b=tZiROv/G5T5hSfAw8BT0EFgHSYRbJPD4f4En11zg/onExBVnL39fzSoR c497FEYwN9E92pYEsdylqC/3GbX6tbWqrEYft3J3pJGrI1dpT1Cpp43nc utUeFIEEANASZxghCsQDwIeREmWntR5IrZUx1VxlRp8UM9UiLhh2QDHQm pyrCb8GZofVh2Md7KYx3q0n5r8x/tzp/nGISWudoWWIC2ShJJBTSbxCio giVszUy8w8/dh5rYQIdsXJ704eRVFb4PcHhGK+rqLXdesPoobDfxDoh5y +OwJshwWu2xMjlVY7GlC8nL6ExS80jk7SKgAnx0NeSDDbBT0bu4AcSWnf Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 5jJN7IFvSvKlx8qiM0vY4w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: RvhQqBJPShSHvESk7QwlQw== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,272,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="214017525" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa6.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 17 Sep 2025 11:24:02 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.58; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 11:23:40 -0700 Received: from [10.12.48.170] (10.10.85.11) by chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2507.58 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 11:23:36 -0700 Message-ID: <1a740af5-78c9-421f-a58a-fd4a2066493a@microchip.com> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 20:23:35 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: microchip: clk for 6.18 #1 To: Stephen Boyd , Arnd Bergmann , SoC Team , , CC: Linux Kernel list , linux-arm-kernel , Alexandre Belloni , Conor Dooley , Claudiu Beznea , , , kbuild test robot References: <20250916080545.9310-1-nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> <0695ca65-536c-48d9-ad1b-49452e67a6f9@microchip.com> <175808457715.4354.11044142356915096975@lazor> From: Nicolas Ferre Content-Language: en-US, fr Organization: microchip In-Reply-To: <175808457715.4354.11044142356915096975@lazor> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Stephen, On 17/09/2025 at 06:49, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Nicolas Ferre (2025-09-16 06:19:11) >> On 16/09/2025 at 10:05, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com wrote: >>> From: Nicolas Ferre >>> >>> Dear clock maintainers, >>> >>> Here are the first clk changes for 6.18. >>> I don't think they have conflict with changes for the deprecated round_rate() >>> to determine_rate() topic. >>> They are in linux-next for a couple of days. >> >> But... this series depends on this patch: >> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250827145427.46819-4-nicolas.ferre@microchip.com >> >> Which will be part of a pull-request to-be-sent soon to arm-soc (which >> is part of linux-next, so the build error doesn't appear there). >> >> Once the pull-request is done, do you prefer that I do an immutable >> branch between CLK and ARM, that I queue this at91 PM patch into the clk >> pull-request or that everything goes through arm-soc? > > Whatever is required to build the code should be included in the PR. If > the same commit goes into arm-soc tree that's OK, just make sure the > branches aren't broken if you checkout a commit anywhere along the > branch that is sent to clk or arm-soc trees. Broken includes > functionally broken. Thanks for your quick response Stephen. v2 of the pull-request has just been sent. Best regards, Nicolas