From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30AE2C43603 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 09:17:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FF7207FF for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 09:17:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="z9FknNNf" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726992AbfLPJRa (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Dec 2019 04:17:30 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com ([209.85.128.68]:53260 "EHLO mail-wm1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726967AbfLPJRa (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Dec 2019 04:17:30 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id m24so4486815wmc.3 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 01:17:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=ympWuvVHTsyQisGFsJE6wNDGlF/BBCJa5n1XjqeTn0M=; b=z9FknNNfh6oxBP9msMi4VEbjlqa3qy68J30GAW/tCYFxV0uy+7uMZCI0ZHCwEHt6YK c/ahqRY/6HR5sEG+IJJTGcnUaYKMALkFB5dCK29eKZ0Ikn98GTodFNyjGLt+HrBxmDjI Sji6eAmYkZ2bbpv6YY+V43m2n5vLUxb7JrWmuALxEJBKxBuRQwChomjkSofJhs/Rvihf Cv2KA2orkiR8gADcIBF7nIYrJLpHR/l1bjkp3eBCoojaycERuYNaAAzaJasrQylpp/Lf 1YfUdVv6KT3wMuK8k7KLM+hx8sFJ72qZQxYOMBeq+HNmi982jr8wro9euBnzO7fTq1rw 5mXg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=ympWuvVHTsyQisGFsJE6wNDGlF/BBCJa5n1XjqeTn0M=; b=F6/ihjwEEmraHVLXX4UKdSpkxLt1I/35y5VGGe8baKuZAxWztdE+YKy1kcdjmll8zW c42zxa2W5uVFCoKjMXvgU1DNL9CUbQ+2Qt1RCZi+QwYTxcW2iUqetCPk4lpHP4tcXp1R gbNBSHBXlHTM+xZUx+sVw+ZenAJPRNB0RYJz1eSIZIuqlkGlXY8qBT3u9HGqhUGRuFFe crqx73i0bmcwPath4kvRpSEJ0jxOslgrbLFFQqi53zMKT3WRvf+jhK4EmqLe66tANByH +GFBylcTzjW6BdM8v7DRx81XxQ06LBkfjnGbg+0ShfZKOnZ4Cjm4lF4yd+9CFtqh2FIk H14Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXp1TcvFCuNrOVDEEs8961bmAAP1h2nO1OaFpeonpICBPvcV9Or +6qZrb/+1pqr33kJ3POpIW+hVaNP7Uw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzU8Tsr5oYK5LGn7OcfoU1jW/4JBvMiYIGT9Wfohalc0a4Io77U2njn9tjcLYyBn3aCc5QqIg== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cf21:: with SMTP id m1mr28670265wmg.170.1576487848048; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 01:17:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (cag06-3-82-243-161-21.fbx.proxad.net. [82.243.161.21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n67sm20894797wmb.8.2019.12.16.01.17.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 16 Dec 2019 01:17:26 -0800 (PST) References: <20190924123954.31561-1-jbrunet@baylibre.com> <1jv9r27kzn.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> <20191203090516.1A03B20661@mail.kernel.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.3.3; emacs 26.3 From: Jerome Brunet To: Stephen Boyd , Michael Turquette Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] clk: let clock perform allocation in init In-reply-to: <20191203090516.1A03B20661@mail.kernel.org> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 10:17:25 +0100 Message-ID: <1jpngobpei.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org On Tue 03 Dec 2019 at 10:05, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Jerome Brunet (2019-11-29 07:36:28) >> >> On Tue 24 Sep 2019 at 14:39, Jerome Brunet wrote: >> >> > This patchset is a follow up on this pinky swear [0]. >> > Its purpose is: >> > * Clarify the acceptable use of clk_ops init() callback >> > * Let the init() callback return an error code in case anything >> > fail. >> > * Add the terminate() counter part of of init() to release the >> > resources which may have been claimed in init() >> > >> > After discussing with Stephen at LPC, I decided to drop the 2 last patches >> > of the RFC [1]. I can live without it for now and nobody expressed a >> > critical need to get the proposed placeholder. >> > >> > [0]: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAEG3pNB-143Pr_xCTPj=tURhpiTiJqi61xfDGDVdU7zG5H-2tA@mail.gmail.com >> > [1]: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190828102012.4493-1-jbrunet@baylibre.com >> > >> >> Hi Stephen, >> >> Do you think we can fit this into the incoming cycle ? >> > > Sorry I missed this one. I'll apply it soon but won't be for this merge > window. No worries, I was referring to the v5.6 cycle, not the v5.5 merge window.