From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 16:59:10 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd To: Joonyoung Shim Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mturquette@linaro.org, haojian.zhuang@gmail.com, james.hogan@imgtec.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: divider: don't set_rate with CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY flag Message-ID: <20150512235910.GC14873@codeaurora.org> References: <1428392806-14538-1-git-send-email-jy0922.shim@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1428392806-14538-1-git-send-email-jy0922.shim@samsung.com> List-ID: On 04/07, Joonyoung Shim wrote: > Even if use CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY flag, divider setting can be changed > by set_rate callback. Don't change divider setting from set_rate > callback of divider with CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY flag. > > Signed-off-by: Joonyoung Shim > --- Is the rate actually changing? Or is it just a problem that we may be writing the register to the same value it already is? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project