From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 18:14:40 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd To: Georgi Djakov Cc: mturquette@linaro.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: qcom: Add support for read-only rcg2 ops Message-ID: <20150606011440.GG29237@codeaurora.org> References: <1433508036-28644-1-git-send-email-georgi.djakov@linaro.org> <1433508036-28644-2-git-send-email-georgi.djakov@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1433508036-28644-2-git-send-email-georgi.djakov@linaro.org> List-ID: On 06/05, Georgi Djakov wrote: > Some root clock generators can be controlled by other processors. In this > case modifying them is not recommended. By using the read-only operations, > the child clocks will be able to get information about their parent - like > rate etc. > > Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd > Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov Do we actually need this? I think I wrote the clk ops for the RCG to make it skip doing anything if there isn't a frequency table. So to make a read-only RCG all we need to do is remove the frequency table? Sorry if I led you down the wrong path. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project