From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 15:00:22 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd To: Heiko Stuebner Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] clk: rockchip: add support for phase inverters Message-ID: <20150706220021.GF20866@codeaurora.org> References: <1436086820-3757-1-git-send-email-heiko@sntech.de> <1436086820-3757-2-git-send-email-heiko@sntech.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1436086820-3757-2-git-send-email-heiko@sntech.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+mturquette=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org List-ID: On 07/05, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > Most Rockchip socs have optional phase inverters connected to some > clocks that move the clock-phase by 180 degrees. > While not having any actual influence on the rate, the inverter > provides its own simple recalc_rate callback as relying on the > fallback in the framework is for "lazy developers" according > to the documentation in the code. The comment about lazy doesn't seem to apply anymore? So I've dropped this last sentence. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel