From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:34:57 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Michael Turquette Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] i.MX clock updates for 4.2 Message-ID: <20150812023456.GC10035@tiger> References: <20150811085921.GB10035@tiger> <20150811174657.2416.1270@quantum> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150811174657.2416.1270@quantum> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de, Stephen Boyd , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+mturquette=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org List-ID: On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:46:57AM -0700, Michael Turquette wrote: > Hi Shawn, > > Quoting Shawn Guo (2015-08-11 01:59:21) > > Hi Michael, Stephen, > > > > The i.MX clock drivers were moved into drivers/clk/imx folder since > > v4.2-rc1, so I would like to send i.MX clock changes through clock tree > > from this cycle. Here is my first pull request to you guys. I'm using > > signed tags, same as how I work with arm-soc folks. Let me know if > > there is any problem with it. > > Everything looks good. Pulled. Thanks, Mike. > > > > > Also, please keep it stable, because I need to pull it into other > > branch as dependency which I will send via arm-soc tree. > > Will do. > > Also, the clock driver was not Cc'd to linux-clk mailing list nor did it > Cc myself or Stephen. I've taken a quick look at it and it seems fine, > but please post clk patches to the linux-clk mailing list in the future. I will ensure that all i.MX clock patches get Cc'd to linux-clk and you guys in the future. Shawn _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel