From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-Path: Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 16:54:46 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Sudeep Holla Cc: Ben Gamari , Thomas Abraham , Sylwester Nawrocki , Michael Turquette , Kukjin Kim , Kukjin Kim , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Tomasz Figa , Lukasz Majewski , Heiko Stuebner , Chanwoo Choi , Kevin Hilman , Javier Martinez Canillas , Tobias Jakobi , Anand Moon , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/12] cpufreq: Add support for Exynos 5800, 5420, and 5422 Message-ID: <20151203112446.GD2097@ubuntu> References: <1449091167-20758-1-git-send-email-ben@smart-cactus.org> <20151203060527.GH4302@ubuntu> <566021E2.6070000@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <566021E2.6070000@arm.com> List-ID: On 03-12-15, 11:05, Sudeep Holla wrote: > The main difference is that we get the OPPs from the firmware rather > than DT. We may just need to abstract that part and we should be able to > use it. I will have a look at it and get back to you will more details. > It has been a while since I looked at cpufreq-dt. I forgot that :( .. but we can then create OPPs at runtime based on what's available from firmware. And we also have an API now to set which CPUs share OPPs... so that might be used as well.. -- viresh