From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tony Lindgren , "Stephen Boyd" , "Tero Kristo" From: Michael Turquette In-Reply-To: <1455312009-808-2-git-send-email-tony@atomide.com> Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "Brian Hutchinson" , "Delio Brignoli" , "Neil Armstrong" , "Matthijs van Duin" , "Philipp Rosenberger" , "Russell King - ARM Linux" , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "Rob Herring" References: <1455312009-808-1-git-send-email-tony@atomide.com> <1455312009-808-2-git-send-email-tony@atomide.com> Message-ID: <20160217010440.2278.62327@quark.deferred.io> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: adpll: Add binding documentation for TI adpll Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:04:40 -0800 List-ID: Hi Tony, Quoting Tony Lindgren (2016-02-12 13:20:08) > Let's add binding documentation for the ADPLL found on dm814x > and dra62x. The binding uses the standard clock binding. > = > Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Rob Herring > Cc: Stephen Boyd > Cc: Tero Kristo > Acked-by: Michael Turquette > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/clock/ti/adpll.txt | 43 ++++++++++++++++= ++++++ > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ti/adpll.txt > = > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ti/adpll.txt b/Docum= entation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ti/adpll.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..8516bf0 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ti/adpll.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ > +Binding for Texas Instruments ADPLL clock. > + > +Binding status: Unstable - ABI compatibility may be broken in the future > + > +This binding uses the common clock binding[1]. It assumes a > +register-mapped ADPLL with two to three selectable input clocks > +and three to four children. > + > +[1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible : shall be one of "ti,dm814-adpll-s-clock" or > + "ti,dm814-adpll-lj-clock" depending on the type of the ADPLL > +- #clock-cells : from common clock binding; shall be set to 0. Thanks for the patch. clock-cells =3D 1 in both of the examples below (which looks right). > +- clocks : link phandles of parent clocks clkinp and clkinpulow, note > + that the adpll-s-clock also has an optional clkinphif > +- reg : address and length of the register set for controlling the ADPLL. > + > +Examples: > + adpll_mpu_ck: adpll@40 { > + #clock-cells =3D <1>; > + compatible =3D "ti,dm814-adpll-s-clock"; > + reg =3D <0x40 0x40>; > + clocks =3D <&devosc_ck &devosc_ck &devosc_ck>; > + clock-names =3D "clkinp", "clkinpulow", "clkinphif"; > + clock-indices =3D <0>, <1>, <2>, <3>; Why is clock-indices necessary? Best regards, Mike > + clock-output-names =3D "481c5040.adpll.dcoclkldo", > + "481c5040.adpll.clkout", > + "481c5040.adpll.clkoutx2", > + "481c5040.adpll.clkouthif"; > + }; > + > + adpll_dsp_ck: adpll@80 { > + #clock-cells =3D <1>; > + compatible =3D "ti,dm814-adpll-lj-clock"; > + reg =3D <0x80 0x30>; > + clocks =3D <&devosc_ck &devosc_ck>; > + clock-names =3D "clkinp", "clkinpulow"; > + clock-indices =3D <0>, <1>, <2>; > + clock-output-names =3D "481c5080.adpll.dcoclkldo", > + "481c5080.adpll.clkout", > + "481c5080.adpll.clkoutldo"; > + }; > -- = > 2.7.0 >=20