From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:30:18 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd To: Mason Cc: Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , Michael Turquette , linux-clk Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: sunxi: Remove use of VLAIS Message-ID: <20160316203018.GQ25972@codeaurora.org> References: <20160226194830.GA21652@lukather> <1456878048-23393-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20160303191604.GW24999@codeaurora.org> <20160304152711.GR8418@lukather> <20160304171841.GF24999@codeaurora.org> <20160308221320.GI8418@lukather> <20160315221601.GJ25972@codeaurora.org> <56E91EA4.7030603@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <56E91EA4.7030603@free.fr> List-ID: On 03/16, Mason wrote: > On 15/03/2016 23:16, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > Applied to clk-next. > > For the record, I will state again that I find it quite sub-optimal > to resort to dynamic allocation for small temporary pointer arrays. > > A fortiori when one considers that getting the patch right required > several attempts. > Feel free to send the patch and then we can discuss and test. For the record, I was waiting for Maxime or Chen-Yu to speak up if they would prefer that approach, but nothing happened. Usually patches spur discussions better than comments. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project