From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>
To: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: samsung: exynos5433: use clock_ignore_unused flag for SPI3 related clocks
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 14:41:57 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160620054157.GA6498@samsunx.samsung> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+Ln22HHNnPuEq1WVs+iiEEbAhdvkADhVkj99pqgR0qJODFUXw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Tomasz,
> >> > The SPI 3 bus uses two clocks, a bus clock and an input clock.
> >> > Do not disable the clocks when unused in order to allow access to
> >> > the SPI 3 device.
> >>
> >> If unused, why would access to SPI 3 device needed?
> >
> > because next I will submit a small driver which uses the SPI3.
> > Actually in the exynos5433 boards all the SPI are used but not all
> > the drivers are ported to mainline.
>
> Then shouldn't the driver request the clocks and enable them? Or I'm
> missing something obvious? :)
the reason is that...
[ from the patch ]
> GATE(CLK_SCLK_IOCLK_SPI3, "sclk_ioclk_spi3", "ioclk_spi3_clk_in",
> - ENABLE_SCLK_PERIC, 20, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
> + ENABLE_SCLK_PERIC, 20,
> + CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
... the sclk_ioclk_spi3 is new in exynos5433 and there is no
implementation for enabling/disabling that particular clock...
> GATE(CLK_SCLK_SPI3, "sclk_spi3", "sclk_spi3_peric", ENABLE_SCLK_PERIC,
> - 18, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
> + 18, CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0),
... while in this case your question makes sense, but it depends
on which clock the device (s3c64xx) is requesting (from the DTS).
In any case, I kept it consistent with the SPI1, which falls in
the same case, as in mainline we don't have any DTS for
exynos5433 (yet!).
Thanks,
Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-20 5:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-17 8:16 [PATCH] clk: samsung: exynos5433: use clock_ignore_unused flag for SPI3 related clocks Andi Shyti
2016-06-18 14:31 ` Tomasz Figa
2016-06-19 5:59 ` Andi Shyti
2016-06-19 13:44 ` Tomasz Figa
2016-06-20 5:41 ` Andi Shyti [this message]
2016-06-20 9:00 ` Tomasz Figa
2016-06-20 10:13 ` Andi Shyti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160620054157.GA6498@samsunx.samsung \
--to=andi.shyti@samsung.com \
--cc=andi@etezian.org \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox