From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 12:10:26 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd To: Peter Ujfalusi Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, tony@atomide.com, lee.jones@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, t-kristo@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/14] clk: twl6040: Rename the driver and use consistent names in the code Message-ID: <20160815191026.GY361@codeaurora.org> References: <20160530085522.30398-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <20160530085522.30398-4-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20160530085522.30398-4-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> List-ID: On 05/30, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > The driver is to provide the functional clock to OMAP4/5 McPDM. The clock > is named as pdmclk in the documentations so change the function names, > structure names and variables to align with this. > At the same time rename the driver from "twl6040-clk" to "twl6040-pdmclk". > This can be done w/o regression since the clock driver is not in use at > the moment, the MFD core driver is not even registering the device for it. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi > --- Applied to clk-next -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project