From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-Path: Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 18:03:07 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Stephen Warren , Lee Jones , Eric Anholt , Florian Fainelli , Ray Jui , Scott Branden , bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, Sylwester Nawrocki , Tomasz Figa , Kukjin Kim , Russell King , Mark Brown , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Marek Szyprowski , Charles Keepax , a.hajda@samsung.com, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [RFC 00/17] clk: Add per-controller locks to fix deadlocks Message-ID: <20160820160307.GB6344@kozik-book> References: <1471354514-24224-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <8519a1cf-ec51-2914-e4aa-27b26b9233de@osg.samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <8519a1cf-ec51-2914-e4aa-27b26b9233de@osg.samsung.com> List-ID: On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 03:31:08PM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Krzysztof, > > On 08/16/2016 09:34 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > RFC, please, do not apply, maybe except patch #1 which is harmless. > > > > > > Introduction > > ============ > > The patchset brings new entity: clock controller representing a hardware > > block. The clock controller comes with its own prepare lock which > > is used then in many places. The idea is to fix the deadlock mentioned > > in commit 10ff4c5239a1 ("i2c: exynos5: Fix possible ABBA deadlock by keeping > > I2C clock prepared") and commit 34e81ad5f0b6 ("i2c: s3c2410: fix ABBA deadlock > > by keeping clock prepared"). > > > > > > I'm not familiar enough with the common clock framework to do a proper review > of this patch-set, but I've tested both on an Exynos5800 Peach Pi Chromebook > and an Exynos5422 Odroid XU4 board and I didn't find any clock regressions. > > Also, I confirmed that the possible deadlock in the Odroid XU4 that was fixed > by reverted commit 10ff4c5239a1 doesn't happen anymore with your patches. > > Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas Thanks for testing, I appreciate that! Best regards, Krzysztof