From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 11:11:38 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: Shawn Guo , Michael Turquette , Fabio Estevam , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: clk-imx35: fix name for ckil clk Message-ID: <20160909181138.GD7243@codeaurora.org> References: <1473327022-8065-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20160909061631.GI16911@tiger> <20160909062034.tim2tzcihui6inoa@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In-Reply-To: <20160909062034.tim2tzcihui6inoa@pengutronix.de> List-ID: On 09/09, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > To += mturquette, sboyd > > Hello Shawn, hello Michael, hello Stephen, > > On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 02:16:31PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:30:21AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > This fixes > > > [ 0.000000] i.MX clk 82: register failed with -17 > > > because the name is duplicated. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König > > > > I did not queue any clock patches for this cycle. Can you please send > > the patches directly to clock maintainers? > > @shawnguo: Is this an ack? > @mturquette, sboyd: should I resend? IMHO the first patch should go in > soon. Does the first patch need a fixes tag? We can apply them directly. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project